2009
DOI: 10.1107/s0909049509005238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation damage in protein crystals examined under various conditions by different methods

Abstract: Investigation of radiation damage in protein crystals has progressed in several directions over the past couple of years. There have been improvements in the basic procedures such as calibration of the incident X-ray intensity and calculation of the dose likely to be deposited in a crystal of known size and composition with this intensity. There has been increased emphasis on using additional techniques such as optical, Raman or X-ray spectroscopy to complement X-ray diffraction. Apparent discrepancies between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably the FMN was reduced by the synchrotron radiation emitted photoelectrons that can reduce initially oxidized moieties. [19, 20] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably the FMN was reduced by the synchrotron radiation emitted photoelectrons that can reduce initially oxidized moieties. [19, 20] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed trigonal-planar distorted geometry is consistent with a Cu +1 ion, despite the fact that crystal growth took place under aerobic conditions. This can be attributed to photoreduction of the metal ion, a common and well documented process that occurs upon high-power synchrotron irradiation of copper proteins [47,48]. Overall, this structure allows us to describe Hcc1 as A. thaliana Sco (AtSco1).…”
Section: The Crystal Structure Of Cu-bound Hcc1mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To detect radiation damage in single-crystal data sets, the R d plot (Diederichs, 2006), anomalous correlation coefficient, scaling B factor and R merge may all be useful, as have been thoroughly reviewed (Dauter, 2006b;Garman & Nave, 2009;Garman, 2010;Borek et al, 2010). For multi-crystal native SAD experiments, these indicators are also effective to detect and reject seriously damaged frames.…”
Section: Radiation Damagementioning
confidence: 99%