2009
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/85/18005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation damage in biological material: Electronic properties and electron impact ionization in urea

Abstract: Abstract. -Radiation damage is an unavoidable process when performing structural investigations of biological macromolecules with X-rays. In crystallography this process can be limited through damage distribution in a crystal, while for single molecular imaging it can be outrun by employing short intense pulses. Secondary electron generation is crucial during damage formation and we present a study of urea, as model for biomaterial. From first principles we calculate the band structure and energy loss function… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that the photoelectrons create more collisional electrons than do the lower-energy Auger electrons.
Figure 2.The cascade of electrons generated by a single electron of energy 500, 1.5, 5 and 8 keV in a urea crystal (CON 2 H 4 ) as calculated by molecular dynamics code [40,41]. The number of secondary electrons generated is plotted as a function of time after the photon absorption event.
…”
Section: Damage Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen that the photoelectrons create more collisional electrons than do the lower-energy Auger electrons.
Figure 2.The cascade of electrons generated by a single electron of energy 500, 1.5, 5 and 8 keV in a urea crystal (CON 2 H 4 ) as calculated by molecular dynamics code [40,41]. The number of secondary electrons generated is plotted as a function of time after the photon absorption event.
…”
Section: Damage Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fluctuation should not be neglected because it indeed contributes to the Bragg peaks to be measured. In our calculations, we do not include resonant absorption [7], shakeup and shakeoff processes [30], and impact ionization [31,32], which would generate further high charge states. Thus, the dynamical fluctuation effect would be enhanced after these processes are taken into account.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Scattering Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band gap of UDNB and DNB were found to be 3.27 and 2.89 eV, respectively. The earlier reported band gaps for urea and DNB are 4.74 and 2.90 eV [17,18]. The refractive index of UDNB crystal was calculated using the relation…”
Section: Energy Band Gap and Refractive Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated refractive index of UDNB and DNB crystals are 2.32 and 2.43, respectively. To ensure the validity, the refractive index of urea and DNB are also calculated by the same method using the reported band gaps [17,18], and their respective values are 2.04 and 2.42, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Band Gap and Refractive Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%