2017
DOI: 10.2172/1599978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Characterization Summary: ACRR-FRECII Cavity Free-Field Environment at the Core Centerline (ACRR-FRECII-FF-cl)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spectra were calculated using 5 billion particles resulting in an average total uncertainty of 0.05%. In this figure it is seen that the 1K, 10K, 50K, and the 100K results are all converging to the same curve and are higher in magnitude than the plot generated for the ACRR FF Characterization Report [1]. At the 0.5 MeV peak, the 10 Point was 112% below the characterized value, the 100 Points was 26% above the characterized value, 1K was 15% above the characterized value, 10K points was 14% above the characterized value, 50K points was 11% above the characterized value, and 100K points was 13% above the characterized value.…”
Section: Point Determinationmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These spectra were calculated using 5 billion particles resulting in an average total uncertainty of 0.05%. In this figure it is seen that the 1K, 10K, 50K, and the 100K results are all converging to the same curve and are higher in magnitude than the plot generated for the ACRR FF Characterization Report [1]. At the 0.5 MeV peak, the 10 Point was 112% below the characterized value, the 100 Points was 26% above the characterized value, 1K was 15% above the characterized value, 10K points was 14% above the characterized value, 50K points was 11% above the characterized value, and 100K points was 13% above the characterized value.…”
Section: Point Determinationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This paper expands only on the Free Field (FF) environment for the ACRR, but there were eight total environments used for the testing of this method [4]. For the ACRR, the environments tested were FF [1], 44-Inch Lead-Boron (LB44) [5], Polyethylene-Lead-Graphite (PLG) [6] and Cadmium-Polyethylene (CdPoly) [7], and for the FREC-II, the environments tested were FF with rods-up and rods-down [8] and CdPoly with rods-up and rods-down. The unique MCNP models for the analyses are found in the appendices of the characterization reports [1,[3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations