2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00350-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
146
0
25

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
146
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential for longitudinal studies is incredible due to the relatively low radiation exposure needed to collect such data. 19,20 As in the studies by FeriniStrambi et al 17 and Vgontzas et al 18 our cases had a BMI near the obesity definition (29.5 ±9.05), while the control group had a lower BMI (23.1±3.05). This means it is not possible with our data to determine if the airway shape seen in the OSA patients was acquired in conjunction with the obesity or whether the airway change was present pre-obesity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The potential for longitudinal studies is incredible due to the relatively low radiation exposure needed to collect such data. 19,20 As in the studies by FeriniStrambi et al 17 and Vgontzas et al 18 our cases had a BMI near the obesity definition (29.5 ±9.05), while the control group had a lower BMI (23.1±3.05). This means it is not possible with our data to determine if the airway shape seen in the OSA patients was acquired in conjunction with the obesity or whether the airway change was present pre-obesity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…26 In contrast to CT imaging, CBCT generates high-resolution isotropic volumetric data with high geometric accuracy at a low effective radiation dose that is only slightly greater than that used in panoramic radiography. 27 CBCT offers a reliable three-dimensional diagnostic image, unlike the 2-dimensional dentopantomograph and occipitomental views provided by conventional radiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mah et al 27 suggested that CBCT result in significantly less effective radiation exposure, between 3 and 18 times lower than various conventional medical CT. As for cost of ordering an image for dental implant assessment, CBCT is less expensive than that of CT. Additional considerations may make CBCT an accessible and affordable option for use in a dentistry like …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%