1999
DOI: 10.1054/brst.1999.0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial scar and carcinoma of the breast: microscopic findings in 32 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
19
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because no absolute mammographic criteria can be used to distinguish a RS or complex sclerosing lesion with associated benign epithelial proliferations from one containing carcinoma, 7,31-35 current practice supports performance of multiple stereotactic core needle biopsies 36,37 to fully evaluate lesions that are radiographically consistent with RS or complex sclerosing lesions. [2][3][4] Only in cases in which atypia is absent and there is good mammographic-pathologic correlation can an excisional biopsy be foregone. 37 If atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ is present, then the treatment and prognostic implications of these particular lesions should apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because no absolute mammographic criteria can be used to distinguish a RS or complex sclerosing lesion with associated benign epithelial proliferations from one containing carcinoma, 7,31-35 current practice supports performance of multiple stereotactic core needle biopsies 36,37 to fully evaluate lesions that are radiographically consistent with RS or complex sclerosing lesions. [2][3][4] Only in cases in which atypia is absent and there is good mammographic-pathologic correlation can an excisional biopsy be foregone. 37 If atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ is present, then the treatment and prognostic implications of these particular lesions should apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the widespread institution of mammographic screening programs, larger RS can be detected and may be virtually indistinguishable mammographically from small invasive carcinomas. [2][3][4] Histologically, RS are characterized by a region of central sclerosis surrounded by a variety of epithelial proliferative lesions, apocrine and cystic changes, and papillomas extending radially from a central zone of sclerosis. When such lesions are greater than 1.0 cm in size, they have been termed "complex sclerosing lesions."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,[15][16][17][18][19] The literature presents a confused picture with regard to the association of carcinoma with radial scar, with the incidence of associated breast carcinoma varying from 0% to 43%. 19,20,22,24,25,29,[31][32][33][34][35] The reported differences in the association of breast carcinoma with radial scars are difficult to reconcile. Many studies are limited by small numbers, the retrospective nature of the analysis, and sometimes by a selection bias of patients likely to be at risk of malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Some studies reviewing radial scars have reported a high rate of association with DCIS and invasive carcinoma (up to 43% in one series). 18,19,29,30,33,34 These series derived patients from selected sources, such as a surgical service of a cancer hospital and other tertiary referral centers, where patients are more likely to be at risk of breast carcinoma. They were mostly case series, and not population-based studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pour d'autres au contraire détermi-ner le caractère indépendant de ce risque est diffi cile dans la mesure où les lésions atypiques associées sont fréquentes. Rarement diagnostiquée sur MB, l'ensemble des auteurs confi rment, compte tenu du risque de cancer associé, la nécessité d'une exérèse chirurgicale [40,47,67,69,94,95,108]. Il est par conséquent important de réaliser que les papillomes multiples présentent des atypies fréquen-tes et qu'en ce sens ces papillomes réalisent un risque très important.…”
Section: Guidelinesunclassified