Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(98)00244-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial profiles of temperature and viscosity in the Earth's mantle inferred from the geoid and lateral seismic structure

Abstract: In the framework of dynamical modelling of the geoid, we have estimated basic features of the radial profile of temperature in the mantle. The applied parameterization of the geotherm directly characterizes thermal boundary layers and values of the thermal gradient in the upper and lower mantle. In the inverse modelling scheme these parameters are related to the observables (geoid and seismic structure of the mantle) through the viscosity profile which is parameterized as an exponential function of pressure an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) which is consistent with inversions of the long-wavelength geoid (Čadek and van den Berg, 1998;Ricard and Bai, 1991) and of observables related to post-glacial rebound (Tosi et al, 2005;Mitrovica and Forte, 2004;Forte and Mitrovica, 2001). An activation volume is implicit in equation (2) and is lower than 5 cm 3 /mol throughout the mantle but it has a non-monotonic Influences of Lower-Mantle Properties on the Formation of Asthenosphere in Oceanic Upper Mantle 145 character (Wentzcovich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Model Description Rheology and Materials Parameterssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1) which is consistent with inversions of the long-wavelength geoid (Čadek and van den Berg, 1998;Ricard and Bai, 1991) and of observables related to post-glacial rebound (Tosi et al, 2005;Mitrovica and Forte, 2004;Forte and Mitrovica, 2001). An activation volume is implicit in equation (2) and is lower than 5 cm 3 /mol throughout the mantle but it has a non-monotonic Influences of Lower-Mantle Properties on the Formation of Asthenosphere in Oceanic Upper Mantle 145 character (Wentzcovich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Model Description Rheology and Materials Parameterssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Woodhouse, 1996a, 1996b;Su and Dziewonski, 1997;Kennett et al, 1998;Masters et al, 2000]. The density to velocity heterogeneity ratio R•,/sv can also be estimated through the geodynamic modeling of geoid based on tomographic models [e.g., Forte et al, 1993Forte et al, , 1994bCorrieu et al, 1994;Cadek and van den Berg, 1998;Cadek and Fleitout, 1999;Forte, 2000] or through the inversion of normal mode data together with gravity data [Ishii and Tromp, 1999]…”
Section: Definitions Geophysical Observations and General Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cadek and van den Berg, 1998). Variance reduction is generally better for slab based density models.…”
Section: The Static Models-fitting the Observed Geoidmentioning
confidence: 99%