1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.75.2662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial Flow inAu+AuCollisions atE=(0.251.1

Abstract: A systematic study of energy spectra for light particles emitted at midrapidity from Au+Au collisions at E=0.25-1.15 A GeV reveals a significant non-thermal component consistent with a collective radial flow. This component is evaluated as a function of bombarding energy and event centrality. Comparisons to Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) and Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) models are made for different equations of state.PACS numbers: 25.75.+r, 25.70.GhCollective motion plays an important role in the decay… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows that the events selected under the E RAT > 1.4 condition exhibit, in a representation of rapidity versus transverse momentum, a nearly isotropic source for the observed hydrogen (Z = 1) products. This is in agreement with previous observations [5][6][7]13].…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…1 shows that the events selected under the E RAT > 1.4 condition exhibit, in a representation of rapidity versus transverse momentum, a nearly isotropic source for the observed hydrogen (Z = 1) products. This is in agreement with previous observations [5][6][7]13].…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The freeze-out temperatures of (1232), produced in Ni + Ni collisions at 1-2A GeV and Au + Au collisions at 1.06A GeV, were extracted in Refs. [33,34] from the radial flow analysis. Further, in Ref.…”
Section: The Kinematical Spectra Of 0 (1232)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The β t value of the different experiments have been determined differently and in addition the impact parameter cut is different. The difference between the data of [7] and of [8] is not understood yet. We observe that the simulations follow very closely the experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…v t (A) is the mean transverse velocity of fragments with the mass number A. We made two fits in order to be comparable with the two sets of experiments [7,8] : one which includes all masses up to ten and a second where only masses smaller than five are included. The β t value of the different experiments have been determined differently and in addition the impact parameter cut is different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%