2004
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000109533.72250.e0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial Artery Graft for Bypass of the Maxillary to Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery: An Anatomic and Technical Study

Abstract: MA-to-MCA bypass is as feasible as proximal MCA revascularization using long vein grafts. The thickness of the MA provides sufficient flow; the length of the graft is short, and it has a straight course. MA-to-proximal MCA bypass may be an alternative to superficial temporal artery-to-MCA as well as extracranial carotid-to-MCA bypasses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parity in caliber between the recipient or donor vessels and the graft used should be taken into consideration when the choice of revascularization strategy is made because a caliber mismatch not only increases the difficulty of anastomosing but also leads to graft failure due to turbulent flow at the anastomotic site, as obzserved in a saphenous vein graft. Our cadaveric results showed the mean ID of the internal maxillary artery before the infraorbital artery to be 2.60 ± 0.30 mm, and other authors have reported that it ranged from 2.54 to 2.60 mm, comparing favorably with our clinical results. These results suggest that a radial artery graft has a lumen caliber and thickness compared to a saphenous vein graft (mean diameter, 4.81 ± 0.53 mm) for matching the internal maxillary artery and even small‐caliber recipient arteries .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parity in caliber between the recipient or donor vessels and the graft used should be taken into consideration when the choice of revascularization strategy is made because a caliber mismatch not only increases the difficulty of anastomosing but also leads to graft failure due to turbulent flow at the anastomotic site, as obzserved in a saphenous vein graft. Our cadaveric results showed the mean ID of the internal maxillary artery before the infraorbital artery to be 2.60 ± 0.30 mm, and other authors have reported that it ranged from 2.54 to 2.60 mm, comparing favorably with our clinical results. These results suggest that a radial artery graft has a lumen caliber and thickness compared to a saphenous vein graft (mean diameter, 4.81 ± 0.53 mm) for matching the internal maxillary artery and even small‐caliber recipient arteries .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A high‐flow bypass also requires a long cervical incision and 2 surgical fields . Internal maxillary artery–middle cerebral artery and –posterior cerebral artery bypasses, sometimes referred to subcranial–intracranial bypasses, have been introduced as alternatives to conventional extracranial–intracranial bypasses in both cadaveric dissections and clinical microsurgical practice . Unlike a low‐flow bypass, a subcranial–intracranial bypass can produce an immediate substantive increase in flow to the hemisphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of the MA between the end of the pterygoid segment and the pterygopalatine segment at the site of anastomosis has been reported to measure 2.76 mm proximal to the IOA (Büyükmumcu et al, ), 2.4 ± 0.33 mm before the descending palatine artery (Arbag et al, ), and 2.6 ± 0.3 mm before the IOA (Ustün et al, ). The selection of the site of anastomosis as a donor vessel varies by author.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of using the IMAX as the donor artery for a high flow EC-IC bypass has been previously proposed by other authors, including Vrionis et al 9 and Ustün et al 10 It has many potential advantages over the standard high flow bypass technique, such as the closer proximity between donor and recipient vessels (which allows a much shorter graft with likely longer graft patency), the ability to perform an EC-IC bypass through a single craniotomy incision, with avoidance of cervical incisions and need for tunneling the graft, improved ease of anastomosis construction using vessels of similar caliber (IMAX-RAG-MCA), and the possibility of making this procedure technically simpler to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%