2017
DOI: 10.21800/2317-66602017000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiação de Síncrotron no Brasil UVX e Sirius

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the addition of FRB 010312, the FRB event rate of the Magellanic Clouds survey is 1/134 deg −2 h −1 , which is similar to the prediction of Champion et al (2016) of 1/144 deg −2 h −1 from the Parkes HTRU survey, which was based on 10 FRB detections. However, Petroff et al (2019) has recently found a further FRB in this same data set giving an updating event rate closer to our measurement of 1/131 deg −2 h −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the addition of FRB 010312, the FRB event rate of the Magellanic Clouds survey is 1/134 deg −2 h −1 , which is similar to the prediction of Champion et al (2016) of 1/144 deg −2 h −1 from the Parkes HTRU survey, which was based on 10 FRB detections. However, Petroff et al (2019) has recently found a further FRB in this same data set giving an updating event rate closer to our measurement of 1/131 deg −2 h −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We can see that the signal is much stronger in the lower part of the observing band. This is similar to FRBs such as FRB 110214 (Petroff et al 2019) andFRB 171019 (Shannon et al 2018). There are also two strong narrow-band RFI signatures close to the band edges, but they do not affect our ability to detect the FRB.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radio telescopes working at low radio frequencies (<300 MHz) are yet to detect any FRBs, despite some efforts to shadow telescopes operating at higher frequencies while the later achieve detections (Sokolowski et al 2018). A useful database to track the current state of published FRB detections is available online at http://frbcat.org (Petroff et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The celestial origin of FRB was confirmed by other discoveries. Shortly after Lorimer's work, a growing number of FRBs were discovered with Parkes at 1.4 GHz, either in archival data (Keane et al 2012;Thornton et al 2013;Burke-Spolaor & Bannister 2014) or from real-time searches (Ravi et al 2015;Petroff et al 2015a;Keane et al 2016;Ravi et al 2016;Petroff et al 2017;Bhandari et al 2018). Telescopes other than Parkes have also detected FRBs (Spitler et al 2014;Masui et al 2015;Bannister et al 2017), including interferometers (Caleb et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%