2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2016.2639043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Remote Sensing of Agricultural Canopies: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 262 publications
1
160
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequent rain events in July and August allow the soil moisture at 5 cm and 10 cm to rise continuously, reaching near saturation by 9 September. 17 Figure 6 shows the surface soil moisture measured in each crop type throughout the growing season. Warm temperatures and limited precipitation in late-May and June are reflected in the relatively dry surface soil moisture values before 30 June.…”
Section: Weather Station Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent rain events in July and August allow the soil moisture at 5 cm and 10 cm to rise continuously, reaching near saturation by 9 September. 17 Figure 6 shows the surface soil moisture measured in each crop type throughout the growing season. Warm temperatures and limited precipitation in late-May and June are reflected in the relatively dry surface soil moisture values before 30 June.…”
Section: Weather Station Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If cloud denies optical recognition of these parameters then SAR must also be used. The use of radar technologies to estimate LAI is well established (see [49,107,108]). These approaches are not without issues, the radar response can saturate at high LAI [49,109] and the results can be confounded by changes in soil moisture content.…”
Section: Eo and Field Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopez-Sanchez et al analyzed several FP observables extracted from Radarsat-2 at C-band and showed the sensitivity of these observables to the rice growth cycle [3]. Research results from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada also showed the potential and effectiveness of SAR data applied in crops' classification, growth parameters inversion and soil moisture inversion [19]. The identification accuracy for crop types in the C-band was about 85% and in X-band about 95% [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%