“…As a result, the refractivity profiles became nearly symmetric [see reference 5, p. 665, in Eshleman et al (9)]. Subsequent to the Kitt Peak conference a plethora of papers was published (see for example, [8][9][10][11], which agreed substantively with our analysis, including two (10, 11) which reported new and independent estimates of the radius (6053.7 + 2.2 km and 6052.5 ± 2 km). The latter value was obtained by means of a fundamentally different technique.…”