2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160801958405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar detection of wetland ecosystems: a review

Abstract: Periodically, reviews of our knowledge of radar-wetland relationships and detection parameters have been provided by various authors. Since the publication of these works, additional research has been completed. Five major remote sensing journals spanning the years 1965-2007 formed the basis of this review. The vast majority of significant material found its way into these mainstream journals in one aspect or another. A short history of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)-wetlands discovery based on earlier reviews… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
143
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of cross-polarization (HV) backscatter was consistently higher than HH for all RF models. In a review paper, Henderson and Lewis [18] noted that in a number of studies HV provided better results than HH for wetland mapping. More specifically, in this study wet-season HV backscatter was an important predictor for all land cover classes, but HH was generally more important in distinguishing wetland classes than terrestrial classes.…”
Section: Random Forest Classifier Performance and Variable Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of cross-polarization (HV) backscatter was consistently higher than HH for all RF models. In a review paper, Henderson and Lewis [18] noted that in a number of studies HV provided better results than HH for wetland mapping. More specifically, in this study wet-season HV backscatter was an important predictor for all land cover classes, but HH was generally more important in distinguishing wetland classes than terrestrial classes.…”
Section: Random Forest Classifier Performance and Variable Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between information classes were higher in the cross-polarization band (HV) than in co-polarization bands (HH or VV). This issue has been pointed out in [11]: the depolarizing character of the vegetation differs according to vegetation structure, biomass distribution and flooding state.…”
Section: Description Of the Scenes And Field Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'all-weather' data collection capability combined with the information content makes SAR an attractive sensor for wetland applications. Henderson and Lewis (2008) provide a review of radar and wetlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%