2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar classifications of consecutive and contiguous human gross‐motor activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example of the probability outputs provided by the Softmax classifier, we show in Table I four random samples from validating the Softmax classifier. We picked four samples from the classes (1) walking, (4) standing up from sitting, (7) falling from walking, and (9) falling from standing. It can be seen that walking has a high prediction accuracy (97.51%) with almost no confusion versus another class.…”
Section: Results For Different Test Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example of the probability outputs provided by the Softmax classifier, we show in Table I four random samples from validating the Softmax classifier. We picked four samples from the classes (1) walking, (4) standing up from sitting, (7) falling from walking, and (9) falling from standing. It can be seen that walking has a high prediction accuracy (97.51%) with almost no confusion versus another class.…”
Section: Results For Different Test Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, researchers have demonstrated detecting sequences of ADLs by using deep learning techniques, such as the long short-term memory (LSTM) [6]. Also, state separation between translational and in-place activities was introduced for the usage of dynamic classifiers increasing the performance with backward in time classification and "re-visiting of activities" [7]- [9]. Other promising results showed a categorization of different walking gaits in unconstrained directions associated to different subjects [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction from radar data can leverage the increasing dimensionality of radar signals (e.g., higher range resolution), frontends with multiple input and multiple output capabilities, increasing angular and spatial diversity, and on the various data representations ranging from raw IQ data directly sampled by the radar directly to range-time, range-Doppler, range-azimuth, angle-of-arrival, spectrograms, cadence velocity diagrams, cepstrograms, phase plots [46], [47], cyclostationarity signatures [48], radon transform signatures [49], and other composite views e.g., range-Doppler surfaces [30]. Thus, open research questions remain as to what format or combination of formats are most suitable for the classification process, perhaps exploiting forms of cognition that modify accordingly such processes depending on the specific activities to be classified.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DTL is used to separate translation activities from inplace activities, whereas within in-place activities with almost no range swath the DTL cannot be applied for discriminating between multiple consecutive in-place activities. For separating such in-place activities, we rely on an energy detector, known as the Power Burst Curve (PBC) [13], [17].…”
Section: Power Burst Curve (Pbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%