Abstract:Abstract. Both M s 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake on 12 May 2008 and M s 7.0 Lushan earthquake on 20 April 2013 occurred in the province of Sichuan, China. In the earthquake-affected mountainous area, a large amount of loose material caused a high occurrence of debris flow during the rainy season. In order to evaluate the rainfall intensity-duration (I -D) threshold of the debris flow in the earthquake-affected area, and to fill up the observational gaps caused by the relatively scarce and low-altitude deployment of … Show more
“…Their conclusions suggest that rain gauges severely underestimate the duration-intensity thresholds. Shi et al (2018) further explored this effect and highlighted the importance of correct recording of the intensity in the core of the limited areas covered by convective rainfall events. Nikolopoulos et al (2014, 2015) have also explored the limitations of conventional rain gauge-based approaches for deriving debris flow occurrence thresholds, and additional studies are presented by Destro et al (2017) and Rossi et al (2017).…”
Section: The Significance Of Rainfall Intensity In Geomorphologymentioning
Rainfall arrival at the land surface drives or influences many geomorphic processes. These range from the mechanisms through which vegetation transforms rain into erosive gravity drops or stemflow, infiltration and water partitioning at the soil surface, the drop-impact sealing of soil surfaces, splash, sheet, and gully erosion, and triggering of the various forms of mass movement including landslides and debris flows. Rainfall intensity is a key influence on many of these mechanisms but is not a straightforward parameter to quantify, partly owing to the customary aggregation of rainfall data to hourly or other clock-time totals. This aggregation conceals intensity fluctuations including erosive ‘intensity bursts’ as well as the intermittency of rainfall. Nevertheless, much research shows that rainfall intensity over short time periods – 10–30 minutes – has great explanatory power. Much of our understanding of the influence of rainfall intensity is based on rainfall simulation experiments, but the value of the findings is limited because simulation is normally carried out using a high and constant rainfall intensity, quite unlike natural rainfall. This has limited our ability to build an understanding of the other important aspects of rainfall intensity, including, critically, its time variation and changed character among different environments – arid, temperate, or tropical. Thus, significant challenges and opportunities remain in the exploration of rainfall intensity in relation to geomorphology and geomorphic processes.
“…Their conclusions suggest that rain gauges severely underestimate the duration-intensity thresholds. Shi et al (2018) further explored this effect and highlighted the importance of correct recording of the intensity in the core of the limited areas covered by convective rainfall events. Nikolopoulos et al (2014, 2015) have also explored the limitations of conventional rain gauge-based approaches for deriving debris flow occurrence thresholds, and additional studies are presented by Destro et al (2017) and Rossi et al (2017).…”
Section: The Significance Of Rainfall Intensity In Geomorphologymentioning
Rainfall arrival at the land surface drives or influences many geomorphic processes. These range from the mechanisms through which vegetation transforms rain into erosive gravity drops or stemflow, infiltration and water partitioning at the soil surface, the drop-impact sealing of soil surfaces, splash, sheet, and gully erosion, and triggering of the various forms of mass movement including landslides and debris flows. Rainfall intensity is a key influence on many of these mechanisms but is not a straightforward parameter to quantify, partly owing to the customary aggregation of rainfall data to hourly or other clock-time totals. This aggregation conceals intensity fluctuations including erosive ‘intensity bursts’ as well as the intermittency of rainfall. Nevertheless, much research shows that rainfall intensity over short time periods – 10–30 minutes – has great explanatory power. Much of our understanding of the influence of rainfall intensity is based on rainfall simulation experiments, but the value of the findings is limited because simulation is normally carried out using a high and constant rainfall intensity, quite unlike natural rainfall. This has limited our ability to build an understanding of the other important aspects of rainfall intensity, including, critically, its time variation and changed character among different environments – arid, temperate, or tropical. Thus, significant challenges and opportunities remain in the exploration of rainfall intensity in relation to geomorphology and geomorphic processes.
“…Mean field bias (MFB) adjustment is a common technique for bias correction in radar rainfall relative to ground stations. It can be computed as the ratio of the mean hourly radar rainfall estimate to the rain gauge measurement (Anagnostou and Krajewski, 1999;Yoo and Yoon, 2010;Hanchoowong et al, 2013;Shi et al, 2018). However, direct application of the MFB does not account for uncertainty in the bias associated with each radar-gauge measurement.…”
Section: Kalman Filter With Two Observations: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct application of the MFB does not account for uncertainty in the bias associated with each radar-gauge measurement. Alternatively, a KF has previously been used to estimate the spatially uniform MFB in real time in several studies, including Anhert et al (1986), Smith and Krajewski (1991), Anagnostou et al (1998), Seo et al (1999), Chumchean et al (2006), Kim and Yoo (2014), and Shi et al (2018). The KF has the benefit of accounting for uncertainties in the observations by weighting the contribution of measurements by their respective error variances (Kalman, 1960).…”
Section: Kalman Filter With Two Observations: Model Assumptionsmentioning
Abstract. The low density of conventional rain gauge networks is often a limiting factor for radar rainfall bias correction. Citizen rain gauges offer a promising opportunity to collect rainfall data at a higher spatial density. In this paper, hourly radar rainfall bias adjustment was applied using two different rain gauge networks: tipping buckets, measured by Thai Meteorological Department (TMD), and daily citizen rain gauges. The radar rainfall bias correction factor was sequentially updated based on TMD and citizen rain gauge data using a two-step Kalman filter to incorporate the two gauge datasets of contrasting quality. Radar reflectivity data from the Sattahip radar station, gauge rainfall data from the TMD, and data from citizen rain gauges located in the Tubma Basin, Thailand, were used in the analysis. Daily data from the citizen rain gauge network were downscaled to an hourly resolution based on temporal distribution patterns obtained from radar rainfall time series and the TMD gauge network. Results show that an improvement in radar rainfall estimates was achieved by including the
downscaled citizen observations compared with bias correction based on the
conventional rain gauge network alone. These outcomes emphasize the value of citizen rainfall observations for radar bias correction, in particular in regions where conventional rain gauge networks are sparse.
“…The composite reflectivity factor (CR) and vertically integrated liquid water content (VIL) are chosen to segregate the convective and stratiform precipitation. Convective precipitation is identified based on that CR > 50 dBZ or VIL > 6.5 kgm −2 [23,35]. Otherwise, the precipitation is classified as being stratiform.…”
Section: (A) Convective and Stratiform Precipitation Segregationmentioning
The quality of radar data is crucial for its application. In particular, before radar mosaic and quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) can be conducted, it is necessary to know the quality of polarimetric parameters. The parameters include the horizontal reflectivity factor, ZH; the differential reflectivity factor, ZDR; the specific differential phase, KDP; and the correlation coefficient, ρHV. A novel radar data quality index (RQI) is specifically developed for the Chinese polarimetric radars. Not only the influences of partial beam blockages and bright band upon radar data quality, but also those of bright band correction performance, signal-to-noise ratio, and non-precipitation echoes are considered in the index. RQI can quantitatively describe the quality of various polarimetric parameters. A new radar mosaic QPE algorithm based on RQI is presented in this study, which can be used in different regions with the default values adjusted according to the characteristics of local radar. RQI in this algorithm is widely used for high-quality polarimetric radar data screening and mosaic data merging. Bright band correction is also performed to errors of polarimetric parameters caused by melting ice particles for warm seasons in this algorithm. This algorithm is validated by using nine rainfall events in Guangdong province, China. Major conclusions are as follows. ZH, ZDR, and KDP in bright band become closer to those under bright band after correction than before. However, the influence of KDP correction upon QPE is not as good as that of ZH and ZDR correction in bright band. Only ZH and ZDR are used to estimate precipitation in the bright band affected area. The new mosaic QPE algorithm can improve QPE performances not only in the beam blocked areas and the bright band affected area, which are far from radars, but also in areas close to the two radars. The sensitivity tests show the new algorithm can perform well and stably for any type of precipitation occurred in warm seasons. This algorithm lays a foundation for regional polarimetric radar mosaic precipitation estimation in China.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.