2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/sp67j
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial Incivility in Everyday Life: A Conceptual Framework for Linking Process, Person, and Context

Abstract: Psychologists use the term racial microaggressions to describe subtle forms of everyday racial incivility and discrimination reported by members of historically underrepresented groups. Growing evidence links self-reported experiences of racial microaggressions to health. Drawing on life-course perspectives on stress, biopsychosocial models of racism, and daily process research, I propose a conceptual framework for investigating daily stress processes (e.g., reactivity, recovery, appraisal, coping), cumulative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, this present investigation considers the role of negative emotionality traits as potential confounds (for a discussion, see Lilienfeld, 2017;Ong, 2021) in the association between affective reactivity to racial discrimination and relationship quality. Considerable evidence indicates that individual differences in neuroticism (a well-established marker of negative emotionality and stress reactivity) may account for differential exposure and reactivity to daily stressors (Bolger & Schilling, 1991;Bolger & Zuckerman, 1995;Gunthert et al, 1999).…”
Section: Affective Reactivity To Daily Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this present investigation considers the role of negative emotionality traits as potential confounds (for a discussion, see Lilienfeld, 2017;Ong, 2021) in the association between affective reactivity to racial discrimination and relationship quality. Considerable evidence indicates that individual differences in neuroticism (a well-established marker of negative emotionality and stress reactivity) may account for differential exposure and reactivity to daily stressors (Bolger & Schilling, 1991;Bolger & Zuckerman, 1995;Gunthert et al, 1999).…”
Section: Affective Reactivity To Daily Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on stress across the life span, biopsychosocial models of racism, and daily process research, Ong (2021; this issue) proposes a conceptual framework for investigating daily stress processes, cumulative stressor exposures, and social structural factors (e.g., institutions, social roles, statuses) that may affect the experience of racial microaggressions in everyday life. Ong describes microaggressions as dynamic in character, considerably varied across individuals, and shaped by the interplay of stressor exposures across multiple timescales and levels of analysis.…”
Section: Consequences and Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals differ in the ways they respond to stress, including in appraisal processes, stressor reactivity, recovery, and coping choice and effectiveness. In turn, the ways that people respond to daily stress can influence long-term health through biobehavioral pathways, such as cardiometabolic functioning, inflammation, and sleep (Ong, 2021). Prior work established between-person associations between discrimination and mental and physical health outcomes (Lewis et al, 2015;Williams et al, 2003), and between discrimination and the biobehavioral pathways mentioned (Lewis et al, 2006(Lewis et al, , 2010Slopen et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars posit that discrimination is a type of psychosocial stressor (Lewis et al, 2015; Williams et al, 2019). A recent framework proposed daily stress processes (e.g., exposure, reactivity, and recovery) as the nexus through which everyday discrimination influences long-term health risks (Ong, 2021). In this framework, experiences of everyday discrimination are situated within a social structure in which institutions distribute power, opportunity, and resources inequitably across social groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%