1986
DOI: 10.1177/009579848601200203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial Differentials in the Impact of Maternal Cigarette Smoking During Pregnancy on Fetal Development and Mortality: Concerns for Black Psychologists

Abstract: Data from more than 60,000 births in the United States were reevaluated by statistical power analysis to determine if racial differentials existed in the impact of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy on low birth weight and infant mortality. The risk of mortality was significantly greater for infants of Black maternal smokers than Black nonsmokers. But the same relationship was not evident for Whites. The most dramatic increase in mortality was exhibited among infants of Black mothers who smoked more t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equally plausible, but also largely unsupported, is the belief that there is a causal relation between discrimination and substance use among African Americans. It has been suggested, for example, that experience with racism increases the likelihood that African Americans will smoke cigarettes (Singleton, Harrell, & Kelly, 1986), drink alcohol (Brown & Tooley, 1989; Sanders-Phillips, 1999), and use and abuse substances in general (Clark et al, 1999; Curtis-Boles & Jenkins-Monroe, 2000; Williams & Neighbors, 2001; Windle, Shope, & Bukstein, 1996; Wright, 2001). In fact, a number of studies have found evidence of positive correlations between substance use and either perceived discrimination or a belief that racism toward African Americans continues to exist in the United States (Sanders-Phillips, 1999), but these studies have also used cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Discrimination and Substance Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally plausible, but also largely unsupported, is the belief that there is a causal relation between discrimination and substance use among African Americans. It has been suggested, for example, that experience with racism increases the likelihood that African Americans will smoke cigarettes (Singleton, Harrell, & Kelly, 1986), drink alcohol (Brown & Tooley, 1989; Sanders-Phillips, 1999), and use and abuse substances in general (Clark et al, 1999; Curtis-Boles & Jenkins-Monroe, 2000; Williams & Neighbors, 2001; Windle, Shope, & Bukstein, 1996; Wright, 2001). In fact, a number of studies have found evidence of positive correlations between substance use and either perceived discrimination or a belief that racism toward African Americans continues to exist in the United States (Sanders-Phillips, 1999), but these studies have also used cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Discrimination and Substance Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singleton, Harrell, and Kelly (1986) also have reported that smoking among Black women is related to psychosocial stress and experiences of racism. They have noted that smoking in Black women may be related to gender role difficulties, including problems of assertion, independence, rebellion, or identification in relationships with men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This conclusion is supported by findings that women who quit smoking are more likely to be married, to have spousal support, and to be employed (U.S. Public Health Service, 1980). Conversely, Black women, who are more likely to be single and live in environments of high stress, are less likely to quit smoking than White women(Singleton et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although studies of these predictor variables have been conducted in different ethnic groups, direct ethnic comparisons have rarely been made. When ethnic comparisons have been reported, as, for example, in infant health status as a function of alcohol ingestion and smoking, ethnicity has often been confounded with social class (Bingol et al, 1987;Singleton, Harrell, & Kelly, 1986), thereby obscuring conclusions about ethnic differences. Similarly, predisposing demographic, reproductive, and health factors have rarely been studied in populations of low socioeconomic status (SES) but not at high risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%