Racial and non-racial discrimination and smoking status among South African adults 10 years after apartheid

Abstract

Background Despite a long history of discrimination and persisting racial disparities in smoking prevalence, little research exists on the relationship between discrimination and smoking in South Africa. Methods This analysis examined chronic (day to day) and acute (lifetime) experiences of racial and nonracial (e.g., age, gender, or physical appearance) discrimination and smoking status among respondents to the South Africa Stress and Health Study (SASH). Logistic regression models were constructed using SAS-Callable SUDAAN. Results Both chronic racial discrimination (RR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.14–1.85) and chronic nonracial discrimination (RR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.37–2.08) predicted a higher risk of smoking, but neither type of acute discrimination did. Total (sum of racial and nonracial) chronic discrimination (RR=1.46, 95%CI: 1.20–1.78) and total acute discrimination (RR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.01–1.60) predicted a higher risk of current smoking. Conclusions Racial and nonracial discrimination may be related to South African adults’ smoking behavior, but this relationship likely varies by the timing and frequency of these experiences. Future research should use longitudinal data to identify the temporal ordering of the relationships studied, include areas outside of South Africa to increase generalizability, and consider the implications of these findings for smoking cessation approaches in South Africa.

Awareness of diabetic foot disease amongst patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the chronic outpatients department at a regional hospital in Durban, South Africa

“…A study in South Africa that analysed the correlation between race and smoking status amongst adult South Africans concluded that smoking habits may be related to race. 39 In SA, black people have the lowest smoking prevalence, and this prevalence is decreasing. 40,41 Given that blacks represent about 75% of the total population in SA and almost 90% of our sample size, this finding may explain the relatively low smoking rates found in the present study.…”

Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol

“…According to the WHO, SDOH influence health equity and can account for up to 30%–55% of variation in health outcomes 50. In the USA, Black Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer and are more likely to die of cancer compared with their white counterparts 6 7 9–14 21 25 51–80. These health disparities are the result of SDOH, such as financial barriers to cancer screening, inequitable access to cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment, and mistrust of the healthcare system 6 7 9–14 21 25 51–80.…”

“…In the USA, Black Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer and are more likely to die of cancer compared with their white counterparts 6 7 9–14 21 25 51–80. These health disparities are the result of SDOH, such as financial barriers to cancer screening, inequitable access to cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment, and mistrust of the healthcare system 6 7 9–14 21 25 51–80. Late stage at diagnosis is the largest contributor to racial differences in cancer survival 11 55 57 61 70 76 79–82.…”

Lookism hurts: appearance discrimination and self-rated health in South Korea

“…Among those types of discrimination, lookism or appearance discrimination refers to prejudice or unfair treatment based on one’s physical attractiveness [ 18 ]. Studies have examined the health impact of appearance discrimination as one of several types of discrimination [ 19 – 21 ]. One study measured three dimensions of discrimination experiences among immigrant workers—discrimination due to immigrant status, physical appearance, and workplace-related—and examined their associations with health [ 19 ].…”