Abstract:Objectives. Racial and ethnic disparities have been documented for many physical health outcomes in children. Less is known, however, about disparities in behavioral and learning disorders in children. This study uses data from a national health survey to examine racial and ethnic differences in identified attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disability (LD). Methods. The 1997–2001 National Health Interview Surveys obtained information from parents about the health and sociodemographic … Show more
“…Compared to white parents, AfricanAmericans perceive social stigma with psychopharmacological treatment for ADHD (Davison et al, 2001). Even after controlling for learning disorders, other health conditions, income, and insurance coverage, African-American children had a 40% lower use of medication for ADHD compared to white children (Pastor & Reuben, 2005). Unlike prior research showing African-American parents' lower acceptance and pursuit of medication for their child's ADHD relative to white parents, racial differences were not evident for behavioural therapy (Krain, Kendall, & Power, 2005).…”
Section: Racial Disparities In Views Of Pediatric Psychopharmacologymentioning
Current evidence strongly points to significant parental concerns about exposing their children to psychopharmacological medications. This is true even with stimulant medications for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), an evidence-based treatment for children. Theory and prior evidence would predict that parents' hesitancy to give their children psychopharmacological medication is likely due to what they hear from family and friends about medication's untoward effects. That social networks impact problem definition, treatment evaluation, and service use is well established. However, it is not known how parents make treatment decisions as they cope with the reality that their child might benefit from psychopharmacological medication. The qualitative research described in this paper addresses this gap. A conceptual model is presented that describes parents' treatment decisions and participation in their children's care as they shift from parenting a child with behavioural problems to parenting a child who eventually requires psychopharmacological medication. Further research is needed to evaluate how this model can offer a more comprehensive understanding of how parents respond to a diagnostic label and various treatment options. It is hoped that this research will stimulate innovative approaches for tailoring treatments that are respectful of the individual needs of children and their families.
“…Compared to white parents, AfricanAmericans perceive social stigma with psychopharmacological treatment for ADHD (Davison et al, 2001). Even after controlling for learning disorders, other health conditions, income, and insurance coverage, African-American children had a 40% lower use of medication for ADHD compared to white children (Pastor & Reuben, 2005). Unlike prior research showing African-American parents' lower acceptance and pursuit of medication for their child's ADHD relative to white parents, racial differences were not evident for behavioural therapy (Krain, Kendall, & Power, 2005).…”
Section: Racial Disparities In Views Of Pediatric Psychopharmacologymentioning
Current evidence strongly points to significant parental concerns about exposing their children to psychopharmacological medications. This is true even with stimulant medications for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), an evidence-based treatment for children. Theory and prior evidence would predict that parents' hesitancy to give their children psychopharmacological medication is likely due to what they hear from family and friends about medication's untoward effects. That social networks impact problem definition, treatment evaluation, and service use is well established. However, it is not known how parents make treatment decisions as they cope with the reality that their child might benefit from psychopharmacological medication. The qualitative research described in this paper addresses this gap. A conceptual model is presented that describes parents' treatment decisions and participation in their children's care as they shift from parenting a child with behavioural problems to parenting a child who eventually requires psychopharmacological medication. Further research is needed to evaluate how this model can offer a more comprehensive understanding of how parents respond to a diagnostic label and various treatment options. It is hoped that this research will stimulate innovative approaches for tailoring treatments that are respectful of the individual needs of children and their families.
“…However, lifetime prevalence has been reported to be higher in Latino children outside the United States, ranging from 8% in Puerto Rico (Canino et al 2004) to 17.1% in Colombia (Pineda et al 2001). The National Health Interview Survey reported that the prevalence of ADHD in Latino children living in the United Stated is about half that of Caucasian children (3.3% vs. 6.5%) (Bloom and Tonthat 2002;Pastor and Reuben 2005), but language barriers, physician bias, and different developmental expectations of Latino mothers may account in part for these differences (Stevens et al 2004). One consistent difference between these ethnic groups is the lower rate of access to pharmacological treatments in the Latino population (Jensen et al 1999;Bauermeister et al 2003;Stevens et al 2004).…”
We examined the effects of atomoxetine in Latino (n = 108) versus Caucasian (n = 1090) pediatric outpatients (aged 6 to <18 years) during the first 10-11 weeks of treatment in two multicenter, open-label trials. Mean modal doses were not significantly different in Latinos (1.22 mg/kg per day) versus Caucasians (1.27 mg/kg per day; p = 0.22). Both groups showed significant and similar improvements: Mean ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHDRS-IV-P:I) scores decreased by 54% in Latinos (40.9-18.9; p < 0.001) and by 52% in Caucasians (37.7-18.2; p < 0.001). Other efficacy measures, such as Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form (CPRS-R:S) and Clinical Global Impressions-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S), demonstrated similar and significant decreases. The only significant between-group difference was a greater decrease in the ADHDRS-IV-P:I Hyperactive/Impulsive subscale at weeks 8-11 for Latinos; however, Latinos had higher baseline scores compared with Caucasians. This was not demonstrated in the CPRS-R:S Hyperactivity subscale. There was a significantly higher frequency of CYP2D6 slow metabolizers in Caucasians compared with Latinos. Caucasians reported significantly more abdominal and throat pain, whereas Latinos reported more decreased appetite and dizziness, but no differences in other common adverse events were reported. No suicidal behavior was reported in either group. We found that Latino and Caucasian children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) exhibit a similar pattern of efficacy and tolerability with atomoxetine. The lack of placebo controls was a limitation of this study.
“…35 Because of small and nonrepresentative samples, previous studies have been limited in their applicability to the gen-eral population. Furthermore, studies [36][37][38] have relied on parent-and teacher-reported cases, which overestimate true prevalence. Accurate estimates of disease burden in a large study population will provide information for determining health care resource allocation for ADHD prevention programs.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.