2016
DOI: 10.1080/07292473.2016.1167416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race, Masculinity and Imperialism: The British Officer and the Egyptian Army (1882–1899)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the language was more politically correct than the racist language used in the nineteenth century, the sentiments of disdain and contempt concerning the defects and inferiority of the Oriental way of war, often lubricated by either ignorance or political malice, became further ingrained. 26 A brief overview of these observations highlights their faults.…”
Section: Iran Cannot Be Allowed the Means To Fight; It Must Be Open Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the language was more politically correct than the racist language used in the nineteenth century, the sentiments of disdain and contempt concerning the defects and inferiority of the Oriental way of war, often lubricated by either ignorance or political malice, became further ingrained. 26 A brief overview of these observations highlights their faults.…”
Section: Iran Cannot Be Allowed the Means To Fight; It Must Be Open Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He focused on the bureaucrat, rather than the soldier or commander, as the basis for imperial masculinity. Most work on the relationship between gender and empire in the late-19 th century emphasizes the ways in which imperialism was seen as embodying the masculine virtues of military prowess and conquest (Deane, 2014; Dighton, 2016). I show that, for Carpenter, the masculine ideals embodied by the empire were far more banal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%