Abstract:OBJECTIVE To carry out a critical review of the literature on the use of race, color, and ethnicity in the field of public health dentistry. METHODS A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed for articles published between 2014 and 2019. Using a data extraction form, we collected information on (1) bibliographic characteristics of the selected papers; (2) race, color, and ethnicity of the study participants and their sociodemographic profiles; and (3) the extent to which the original publications … Show more
“…In this study, only a few articles described the role of race and ethnicity in their analytical models, a finding also reported elsewhere (Reginaldo et al, 2022; Susarla et al, 2014). Some studies stated that race/ethnicity was a proxy for SEP, whereas others used it as an effect modifier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, we argue that any relation between race/ethnicity and oral health should be interpreted in the context of hierarchy and oppression (Berman & Paradies, 2010). Nevertheless, it is common to see genetic‐based explanations for racial/ethnic oral health inequities (Bastos et al, 2018; Reginaldo et al, 2022) despite the lack of meaningful biological differences, between race‐ or ethnicity‐based groups (Gravlee, 2009; Templeton, 2013).…”
AimThis study aims to (1) describe trends in explanations provided for racial/ethnic inequities in dental caries and periodontitis, and (2) explore the patterns of relatedness among explanations for these inequities.Materials and MethodsHighly cited publications based on studies indexed in the Scopus database were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Explanations for racial/ethnic inequities were classified into eight different, but interrelated domains. We assessed trends and examined the relations among explanations using multiple correspondence analysis.ResultsA total of 200 articles among the most cited publications were selected. The proportion of studies invoking racism as an explanation for racial inequities in oral health increased from 0% to 14.3%, from 1937 to 2020. The proportions of individual socio‐economic factors increased from 52.0% to 82.9%, and dental care from 28.0% to 62.9%. The remaining explanations were stable: psychological/behavioural processes (62.5%), biological factors (49.5%), contextual/area‐level effects (24.0%) and immigrant paradox (4.0%). Multiple correspondence analysis revealed a smaller axial distance between racism and the following categories: studies from Brazil, recent publications and Blacks/Hispanics/mixed‐race groups. Publications about immigrants were axially closer to the high‐income countries category.ConclusionsOur findings call on dental researchers to consider racism as a cause for existing racial/ethnic inequities in oral health.
“…In this study, only a few articles described the role of race and ethnicity in their analytical models, a finding also reported elsewhere (Reginaldo et al, 2022; Susarla et al, 2014). Some studies stated that race/ethnicity was a proxy for SEP, whereas others used it as an effect modifier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, we argue that any relation between race/ethnicity and oral health should be interpreted in the context of hierarchy and oppression (Berman & Paradies, 2010). Nevertheless, it is common to see genetic‐based explanations for racial/ethnic oral health inequities (Bastos et al, 2018; Reginaldo et al, 2022) despite the lack of meaningful biological differences, between race‐ or ethnicity‐based groups (Gravlee, 2009; Templeton, 2013).…”
AimThis study aims to (1) describe trends in explanations provided for racial/ethnic inequities in dental caries and periodontitis, and (2) explore the patterns of relatedness among explanations for these inequities.Materials and MethodsHighly cited publications based on studies indexed in the Scopus database were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Explanations for racial/ethnic inequities were classified into eight different, but interrelated domains. We assessed trends and examined the relations among explanations using multiple correspondence analysis.ResultsA total of 200 articles among the most cited publications were selected. The proportion of studies invoking racism as an explanation for racial inequities in oral health increased from 0% to 14.3%, from 1937 to 2020. The proportions of individual socio‐economic factors increased from 52.0% to 82.9%, and dental care from 28.0% to 62.9%. The remaining explanations were stable: psychological/behavioural processes (62.5%), biological factors (49.5%), contextual/area‐level effects (24.0%) and immigrant paradox (4.0%). Multiple correspondence analysis revealed a smaller axial distance between racism and the following categories: studies from Brazil, recent publications and Blacks/Hispanics/mixed‐race groups. Publications about immigrants were axially closer to the high‐income countries category.ConclusionsOur findings call on dental researchers to consider racism as a cause for existing racial/ethnic inequities in oral health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.