Race in biology and anthropology: A study of college texts and professors

Abstract

Information about social issues is underemphasized in college science education. This article takes the race concept as an example of this neglect. We review the history of the race concept and report the current status of the concept in textbooks and among professors. Responses to surveys of faculty at Ph.D.-granting departments indicate that 67% of biologists accept the concept of biological races in the species Homo sapiens, while only 50% of physical anthropologists do so. Content analysis of college textbooks indicates a significant degree of change over time (1 in physical anthropology but a lesser degree in biology. We suggest several reasons for the dissimilarity in the two disciplines. We propose continued use of the concept for some infrahuman species, while abandoning its application to Homo supiens. For those biologists and anthropologists who continue to use the concept, scientific accuracy can be achieved by the presentation in lecture and text of the following ideas: first, consensus among scientists on the race concept's utility and accuracy does not exist; second, there is more variation within than between so-called races; third, discordant gradations due to natural selection, drift, and interbreeding make consistent racial boundary lines impossible to identify; fourth, past use of the race concept has had harmful consequences; fifth, the most precise study of human hereditary variation maps one trait at a time; and sixth, racial labels are misleading, especially as most populations have a cultural designation.We believe that information about social and conceptual issues relating to biology is a crucial but underemphasized part of the education of college students, because many of them will be teachers, and all of them will participate in society as citizens. Recognition of this deficit in science education has been recently acknowledged by a number of scientists (Bernstein,

Toward a Sociology of Racial Conceptualization for the 21st Century

“…Most existing research on racial concepts, while thoughtprovoking, suffers from such sampling limitations. Lieberman and Littlefield (Lieberman, Hampton, Littlefield and Hallead 1992;Littlefield, Lieberman and Reynolds 1982), for example, have authored several reports on scientists' views of race, and Hirschfeld (1996) conducted a powerful set of experiments to discern children's concepts of race. In this context, the research conducted by Apostle et al is a notable attempt to trace sociodemographic patterns in racial conceptualization.…”

The Persistent Power of "Race" in the Cultural and Political Economy of Racism

“…Marshall (170) interjected the impor tant dimension of power into the debate between the "lumpers," who object to race, and the "splitters," who, for a variety of reasons, accept the existence of races and the validity of a concept of race for describing genetically inher ited traits that vary across populations (243:297-298; see also 41, 178). Lie berman and his colleagues (156,158,159,161) surveyed the "declining con sensus" on the existence of races and the usefulness of the race concept. Among physical anthropologists, who are more likely to retain race as a core idea, forensic anthropologists are particularly invested in racial classification.…”

The conceptualization and operationalization of race and ethnicity by health services researchers

“…Morning explored the definitions and meanings of race with biology professors, anthropology professors and college students (Morning 2004). Lieberman, Hampton, Littlefield and Hallead asked anthropology and biology professors to define race (Lieberman et al. 1992).…”