Race Before “Whiteness”: Studying Identity in Ptolemaic Egypt

Abstract

This paper examines the models classical historians and papyrologists use to study Greek and Egyptian identity during the period of Greek occupation of Egypt (332-30 B.C.E.). Employing the concept of ethnicity, some scholars have recently emphasized the fl uidity with which identity seems to operate in colonial documents from the Ptolemaic period. In particular, scholars argue that these documents attest to the increasing ability of certain “native Egyptians” to act as “Greek” in various administrative and legal contexts. While fi nding this recent use of ethnicity productive in grappling with the complexity of identity as a form of social practice in Ptolemaic Egypt, I nonetheless caution against over-emphasizing the role of context and individual agency within this colonial framework. In contrast, I argue that the concept of race should be added to current models to allow historians of this period to situate certain performances within a larger colonial structure that continued to treat the categories of “Greek” and “Egyptian” as conceptually distinct and indeed representative of inverse positions of social power.

Anti‐Judaism versus anti‐Semitism: The racialization of Jews in late antiquity

“…9 9 The list of premodern critical race studies of the Classical period is growing quickly. Notable examples of recent works include Haley (2009, 1993), Murray (2021), McCoskey (2012, 2003, 2002). The edited volume published in response to the Black Athena debate also contains some helpful introduction to the various issues involved in the study of Classics and race.…”

The reflexive character of archaeological reasoning: A case study of hellenistic finds in Serbian archaeology

“…Nasuprot tradicionalnom tumačenju, širenje grčke kulture na Istoku se iz savremene perspektive neretko posmatra upravo kao forma kolonijalizma, a helenistička kultura kao imperijalističko sredstvo vladanja na pokorenom području (Burstein 1997;McCoskey 2002). Nasuprot helenocentričnom pristupu, sada se sve više ističe potreba za istraživanjem takozvanih domaćih kultura, zajednica i tradicija koje su Grci zatekli na osvojenoj teritoriji, njihovog odnosa sa vladajućom elitom, kao i kontinuiteta u pogledu njihovih kulturnih, društvenih, religioznih i političkih tradicija (Kuhrt andSherwin-White 1987, 1993;Erskine 2007, 3;Samuel 1993, 183).…”

“…Međutim, izvori koje je koristila i na koje se pozivala klasična arheologija u istraživanju helenizma bili su skoro isključivo grčki i rimski izvori vezani za svet političke, ekonomske i kulturne elite (Eraskine, 2007;McCoskey, 2002). Proučavanje alternativnih pisanih tradicija (npr.…”