Race and shared decision-making: Perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is an important component of patient-centered healthcare and is positively associated with improved health outcomes (e.g. diabetes and hypertension control). In shared decision-making, patients and physicians engage in bidirectional dialogue about patients' symptoms and treatment options, and select treatment plans that address patient preferences. Existing research shows that African-Americans experience SDM less often than whites, a fact which may contribute to racial disparities in diabetes outcomes. Yet little is known about the reasons for racial disparities in shared decision-making. We explored patient perceptions of how race may influence SDM between African-American patients and their physicians. We conducted in-depth interviews (n=24) and five focus groups (n= 27) among a purposeful sample of African-American diabetes patients aged over 21 years, at an urban academic medical center in Chicago. Each interview/focus group was audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and imported into Atlas.ti software. Coding was conducted iteratively; each transcription was independently coded by two research team members. Although there was heterogeneity in patients' perceptions about the influence of race on SDM, in each of the SDM domains (information-sharing, deliberation/physician recommendations, and decision-making), participants identified a range of race-related issues that may influence SDM. Participants identified physician bias/discrimination and/or cultural discordance as issues that may influence physician-related SDM behaviors (e.g. less likely to share information such as test results and more likely to be domineering with African-American patients). They identified mistrust of white physicians, negative attitudes and internalized racism as patient-related issues that may influenceCorresponding Author E-Mail: mpeek@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. African-American patients' SDM behaviors (e.g. less forthcoming with physicians about health information, more deference to physicians, less likely to adhere to treatment regimens). This study suggests that race-related patient and physician-related barriers may serve as significant barriers to shared decision-making between African-American patients and their physicians. Finding innovative ways to address such communication barriers is an important area of future research. NIH Public Access

Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians

“…In this paper, we also describe a conceptual model, informed by previous work, 14,19,45,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] that demonstrates how social identity, perceptions of social identity, and structural inequities all inform shared decision making between patients and physicians. Expectations for, and the interpretation of, clinical encounters are often influenced by past experiences and normative beliefs about physicians and healthcare deliv- ery.…”

“…The development of our model draws upon prior research and model development in two areas: shared decision making among African-Americans with diabetes 19,[69][70][71] and intersectionality among multiply disadvantaged groups. 14,45,[72][73][74][75][76][77] We also confirmed our conceptual model's core constructs using the studies described in our systematic review.…”

A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients

“…62 Committed leadership and staff can help integrate SDM into usual care and encourage patients and clinicians to expect SDM as part of quality care. For example, organizations should include a commitment to diversity and culturally appropriate SDM 91 in mission statements and policies (Table 2).…”

Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department

“…16 Power differentials between providers and patients can inhibit SDM. Patients raise concerns about providers "talking down" to them 17 and feeling they are unable to express a lack of understanding. 18 These effects may be strongest in those with limited health literacy, 16,18 emphasizing the challenge of providing information at an appropriate level without being perceived as condescending.…”