2005
DOI: 10.1177/0011000005276733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race and Racism in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current systematic review elucidates that race and ethnicity have received far too little attention in the study of the association between CRP and depressive symptoms, which is particularly troublesome given that cultural variables have historically been considered nuisance variables (Hall et al, 2016; Sue, 1999) that receive passing or even hostile attention by researchers (Neville and Carter, 2005). Notably, 75% of the studies in the systematic review did not report basic descriptive participant data, such as demographic and ethnicity/race data, and for those that did, minority populations made up such a small aspect of their sample size that there is likely not enough power in order to detect robust, race/ethnicity specific, and generalizable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current systematic review elucidates that race and ethnicity have received far too little attention in the study of the association between CRP and depressive symptoms, which is particularly troublesome given that cultural variables have historically been considered nuisance variables (Hall et al, 2016; Sue, 1999) that receive passing or even hostile attention by researchers (Neville and Carter, 2005). Notably, 75% of the studies in the systematic review did not report basic descriptive participant data, such as demographic and ethnicity/race data, and for those that did, minority populations made up such a small aspect of their sample size that there is likely not enough power in order to detect robust, race/ethnicity specific, and generalizable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalized by several US-based psychological organizations (Arredondo et al 1996;American Psychological Association 2002;American Counseling Association 2015) and popularized by myriad special journal issues (e.g., Note. Though the three columns above are not meant to denote mutual exclusivity or strict historical consecutiveness, BPathologization^refers to early sexology characterized by research and practice from the late nineteenth century (∼1870) through the early 1970s, BIncorporation^refers to the Bnewp sychology of sexual orientation that emerged after the declassification of homosexuality from the DSM in 1974, and BAffirmation^refers to discourse of LGBT affirmative therapy since the mid-1990s Neville and Carter 2005) and handbooks (Ponterotto et al 2009), multicultural competency typically denotes: knowledge (of diverse groups' experiences, as well as the concepts of privilege and oppression), skills (for working with diverse clients in a culturally appropriate, affirmative, and empowering manner), and awareness (of one's own biases and cultural dynamics that might affect the therapeutic alliance). Though the multicultural discourse in applied psychology initially focused on race and ethnicity and distinguished itself by foregrounding the experiences of racial minorities as the targets of discrimination (as opposed to social psychology's tendency to study the perpetrators of discrimination), multicultural competencies are not limited to knowledge, skills, and awareness about racial and ethnic minorities.…”
Section: The Multicultural Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moradi, 2012;Moradi, Subich, & Phillips, 2002;Neville & Carter, 2005), with, for example, themes like the fusion of feminism and social justice being actively explored and theorized (Moradi, 2012(Moradi, , pp. 1134(Moradi, -1136.…”
Section: Self and Societymentioning
confidence: 99%