2018
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01374-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 (RHDV2; GI.2) Is Replacing Endemic Strains of RHDV in the Australian Landscape within 18 Months of Its Arrival

Abstract: (RHDV2; GI.2) is a pathogenic calicivirus that affects European rabbits () and various hare () species. GI.2 was first detected in France in 2010 and subsequently caused epidemics in wild and domestic lagomorph populations throughout Europe. In May 2015 GI.2 was detected in Australia. Within 18 months of its initial detection GI.2 had spread to all Australian states and territories and rapidly became the dominant circulating strain, replacing (RHDV/GI.1) in mainland Australia. Reconstruction of the evolutionar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
143
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
143
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this recombinant variant was also detected in a hare, suggesting that the GI.2 capsid protein is responsible for permissivity of hare cells to infection. This is further supported by full‐genome sequencing of five GI.2 viruses isolated from European brown hares in Australia, which confirmed that these infections were also due to recombinant GI.2 viruses (GI.1b non‐structural genes, GI.2 structural genes) (Mahar et al., ). This once again highlights the importance of recombination for generating genetic diversity in caliciviruses and indicates the frequency with which new viruses can emerge when genetically diverse lagoviruses circulate concurrently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, this recombinant variant was also detected in a hare, suggesting that the GI.2 capsid protein is responsible for permissivity of hare cells to infection. This is further supported by full‐genome sequencing of five GI.2 viruses isolated from European brown hares in Australia, which confirmed that these infections were also due to recombinant GI.2 viruses (GI.1b non‐structural genes, GI.2 structural genes) (Mahar et al., ). This once again highlights the importance of recombination for generating genetic diversity in caliciviruses and indicates the frequency with which new viruses can emerge when genetically diverse lagoviruses circulate concurrently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This study utilized rabbit calicivirus strains of the lagovirus GI genogroup, belonging to the variant groups GI.1c, GI.1a, GI.4eP‐GI.1a (GI.1a‐Aus), GI.1bP‐GI.2, GI.4eP‐GI.2 (newly identified in this study), GI.4a, GI.4b and GI.4c, where P denotes the polymerase variant for recombinant viruses (Mahar et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010 a novel lagovirus, known as RHDV2 (or RHDVb), was discovered in France and has since spread rapidly throughout Europe, replacing existing strains of classical RHDV (Dalton, Nicieza, Abrantes, Esteves, & Parra, ; Le Gall‐Reculé et al, ). RHDV2 was first reported in Australia in May 2015 and spread rapidly, reaching Victoria and South Australia by December 2015 and Western Australia by August 2016 (Mahar et al, ). Laboratory studies using experimental infections with early isolates of RHDV2 indicated that mortality rates due to RHDV2 infection were lower than RHDV, with a longer infectious period (Dalton et al, ; Le Gall‐Reculé et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation of the IgM and IgA ELISA to RHDV2 by using RHDV2 specific antigen and MAb increased the sensitivity of these assays for RHDV2 IgM and IgA detection substantially. While the use of the original RHDV IgA and IgM assays is sufficient to infer broader disease activity patterns in wild rabbit populations for all lagoviruses including RHDV2 (Figure a), switching to these more sensitive assays for future large‐scale field epidemiology studies should be considered if RHDV2 remains the dominant strain in the Australian landscape (Mahar, Hall, et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not only genetically distinct from RHDV and RHDVa but, unlike RHDV and RHDVa, is also able to cause highly fatal disease in very young rabbits (Dalton, Nicieza, Abrantes, Esteves, & Parra, ; Neimanis, Pettersson, Huang, Gavier‐Widen, & Strive, ) and is capable of fatally infecting several species of hares (Camarda et al, ; Hall et al, ; Le Gall‐Recule et al, ; Neimanis, Ahola, et al, ; Puggioni et al, ; Velarde et al, ). Since its arrival in Australia, RHDV2 has become the dominant strain circulating in the field, seemingly replacing older RHDV strains and accounting for the majority of reported cases in wild and domestic rabbits (Mahar, Hall, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%