2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000200020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rabbit antibodies for hormone receptors and HER2 evaluation in breast cancer

Abstract: SUMMARYBACKGROUND. Novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies (RabMab) for estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) receptors and HER2 evaluation by immunohistochemistry have recently been commercially released. We compared the RabMab anti-ER, anti-PR and anti-HER2 to mouse monoclonal antibodies (Mab) using tissue microarrays (TMA) of breast carcinomas. METHODS. Two TMA containing breast carcinomas were built. Sections were immunostained using anti-ER and anti-PR, Mab and RabMab. The sections stained for ER and PR were evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some series have shown that rabbit monoclonal antibodies (RabMab) for hormone receptors and HER2 have presented better results when compared to mouse monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). However, Mabs for ER (6F11) have shown similar results compared to RabMab and Mabs for HER2 and seemed to be more specific than RabMab for HER2 24 In our study,we evaluated the immunohistochemical staining using an H-score based on intensity and the percentage of stained cells. Semi-quantitative studies for basal markers have established a cutoff of 10% or greater for basal cytokeratin staining to designate the tumor as positive for basal markers 8,9,11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some series have shown that rabbit monoclonal antibodies (RabMab) for hormone receptors and HER2 have presented better results when compared to mouse monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). However, Mabs for ER (6F11) have shown similar results compared to RabMab and Mabs for HER2 and seemed to be more specific than RabMab for HER2 24 In our study,we evaluated the immunohistochemical staining using an H-score based on intensity and the percentage of stained cells. Semi-quantitative studies for basal markers have established a cutoff of 10% or greater for basal cytokeratin staining to designate the tumor as positive for basal markers 8,9,11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Single FFPE sections of human tissue were stained with 2 to 5 different commercially available, fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against the same protein target (Table 1 ), and the signal intensity from the different clones was compared. The performance of fluorophore-conjugated antibodies was evaluated against the clinical-grade antibodies used in practice by the Pathology Department at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) 44 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%