2002
DOI: 10.1007/s007100200041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since f is zero at this point there is no jump in the bifurcation parameter. As far as the transition lines are concerned, this phase diagram is similar to what obtained in MCT for structural glasses [23], however the properties of the low temperature phase are different [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since f is zero at this point there is no jump in the bifurcation parameter. As far as the transition lines are concerned, this phase diagram is similar to what obtained in MCT for structural glasses [23], however the properties of the low temperature phase are different [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…For q 0 = 0 this reduces to that found by Götze [23]. Defining f = (q 1 −q 0 )(1−q 0 ) −1 we recover the usual equation for p-spin-like models at the discontinuous transition [9,21].…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless various quantities, like the so-called non-ergodicity parameter (essentially the height of the plateau of the correlators), compare very well with the numerical data. Furthermore the theory provides a detailed set of predictions for the behavior of the critical correlators and the dynamical exponents [3] that reproduce quite well the numerical data [4][5][6]. For these reasons many believe that the inclusion of some sort of corrections to the theory, possibly taking into account finite-dimensional effects leading to some some sort of hopping processes, could extend MCT down to the laboratory glass transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…From Eqs. (9) and (10) it then follows that j = i. Or to put this in other words: the first (second, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%