1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018388430317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autumn-sown barley has many advantages over the traditional spring-sown barley cropping system that has historically been used in the Upper Midwest, including higher yield potential, earlier harvest, enhancement of some malting quality parameters, higher nitrogen and water use efficiency, and escape from some major “summer” diseases ( Ellis and Russell, 1984 ; Pržulj et al, 1998 ; Nielsen and Munck, 2003 ; Zhong et al, 2019 ). Ellis and Russell (1984) conducted field trials to compare the agronomic traits of winter vs. spring barleys under autumn and spring sowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autumn-sown barley has many advantages over the traditional spring-sown barley cropping system that has historically been used in the Upper Midwest, including higher yield potential, earlier harvest, enhancement of some malting quality parameters, higher nitrogen and water use efficiency, and escape from some major “summer” diseases ( Ellis and Russell, 1984 ; Pržulj et al, 1998 ; Nielsen and Munck, 2003 ; Zhong et al, 2019 ). Ellis and Russell (1984) conducted field trials to compare the agronomic traits of winter vs. spring barleys under autumn and spring sowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All winter and spring barleys had a higher number of spikes and grain yield under autumn sowing compared with spring sowing. In addition to agronomic traits, winter growth habit cultivars can also produce higher amounts of malt extract with less protein content than spring cultivars; however, they did contain higher levels of β-glucan that can reduce malting quality ( Pržulj et al, 1998 ; Nielsen and Munck, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%