2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017909131054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the MNDO, AM1, and PM3 methods correctly reproduce the most important thermodynamic and molecular characteristics [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], electronegativities, and inductive and mesomeric parameters of groups of atoms [48,49] is series of compounds. Among these methods, only PM3 yields reasonable results for the heats of formation of nitroso compounds [24,30] and dimethyl sulfone [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the MNDO, AM1, and PM3 methods correctly reproduce the most important thermodynamic and molecular characteristics [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], electronegativities, and inductive and mesomeric parameters of groups of atoms [48,49] is series of compounds. Among these methods, only PM3 yields reasonable results for the heats of formation of nitroso compounds [24,30] and dimethyl sulfone [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the MNDO, AM1, and PM3 methods correctly reproduce the most important thermodynamic and molecular characteristics [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], electronegativities, and inductive and mesomeric parameters of groups of atoms [48,49] is series of compounds. Among these methods, only PM3 yields reasonable results for the heats of formation of nitroso compounds [24,30] and dimethyl sulfone [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,[36][37][38]. Further progress in the theory and computational capabilities of quantum-chemical methods led to more complicated models which should be classed with modern QSPR method discussed below.…”
Section: Previous Methods Of Calculation Of Ionization Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of molecular-tree structured fingerprint (MTSF) of morpholine molecule as numerical notation of the dependence of minimal energies (E min ) of interaction between O-probe and morpholine molecule on the topological distance (TP) to the oxygen atom therein [167]. QSPR calculations of pK a 's also utilized such descriptors as charges on atoms [37,38,158,175,190,201], group philicity [197], parameters of atoms relevant to molecular mechanics (SYBYL-type atoms) [173,174], empirical parameters included into free online SPARC package (see below) [198], semiempirical descriptors [37, 38, 163-165, 171, 172, 175, 190], and (less frequently) experimental physicochemical parameters [151,[163][164][165]. In the past decade, topological descriptors were used most extensively, in particular fragment descriptors [187], topological distances [167,173,174], 3D molecular interaction fields [167], molecular-tree structured fingerprints (MTSF) [162,167,173,174], and "quantum chemical topology" descriptors calculated in terms of the quantum similarity theory (QST) [161,169].…”
Section: Methods Based On Quantitative Structure-property Relationshimentioning
confidence: 99%