2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023498530313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest is the negative swelling (≈−0.02%) obtained at 300 K for the lowest loading (80 molecules corresponding to 11 mg/g). Volume contraction of porous carbons at low loadings is a well-documented fact in the literature, and the contraction ratio obtained here is typical of those observed experimentally or predicted using thermodynamic models of adsorption-induced deformation . We stress that the present work is, to our knowledge, the first direct observation of such a contraction in a disordered microporous carbon from molecular simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular interest is the negative swelling (≈−0.02%) obtained at 300 K for the lowest loading (80 molecules corresponding to 11 mg/g). Volume contraction of porous carbons at low loadings is a well-documented fact in the literature, and the contraction ratio obtained here is typical of those observed experimentally or predicted using thermodynamic models of adsorption-induced deformation . We stress that the present work is, to our knowledge, the first direct observation of such a contraction in a disordered microporous carbon from molecular simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A common approximation made in most of the molecular simulation studies is to assume that the kerogen framework is rigid (i.e., kerogen atoms are held frozen during the simulation), allowing one to have a constant volume as required in GCMC calculations and also saving a tremendous amount of computational time as solid–solid interactions (which dominates in number) do not have to be considered. However, it has been known for a very long time that porous carbons, especially coals, can significantly swell, depending on the strength of adsorbate–matrix interactions, under fluid loading. Some authors have proposed some theoretical frameworks for the prediction of adsorption-induced deformation that have been applied to coal , or kerogen swelling. These methods are all based on the integration of the adsorption isotherm, computed in the undeformed (rigid) matrix with respect to either the free energy or the fluid reservoir pressure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite evident that within a temperature range of 216 to 353 K (curves 1-5, see Figure 6) in the course of adsorption, the SiC-AC adsorbent exhibits a non-monotonic deformation, starting from contraction at low adsorption values (for example, η a < 0 for a < 5 mmol/g, curve 1) and turning into expansion as the xenon pressure increases (η a < 0, for a > 5 mmol/g, curve 1). Such a non-monotonic character of the adsorption-induced deformation is inherent to microporous adsorbents, including activated carbons [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67], zeolites [68], and MOF [69,70]. Neimark and Grenev proposed a theoretical approach [71] based on Polanyi's potential adsorption theory [72], which was later elaborated by Dubinin and coworkers into the theory of volume filling of micropores [14,15].…”
Section: Adsorption-and Temperature-induced Deformation Of the Sic-ac Adsorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurable volume changes have been reported for a variety of porous materials, such as clays, porous silicas, controlled pore glasses, zeolites, polymers, aerogels, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In applications such as shale gas extraction, [10][11][12] accounting for these volume changes is important because they can impact the structural integrity and production of a reservoir. In catalysis and separations, changes in adsorbent volume can lead to significant physical degradation of the porous particles comprising the unit operation, adversely affecting its performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%