2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023926802198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because O. rufipogon is a perennial species and cultivated rice is an annual species, it has been proposed that the annually occurring form of O. rufipogon, Oryza nivara, may represent the most recent ancestor of O. sativa (13,15). Here we treat both O. rufipogon and O. nivara as part of the same ancestral gene pool and do not differentiate between these names when referring to wild rice.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because O. rufipogon is a perennial species and cultivated rice is an annual species, it has been proposed that the annually occurring form of O. rufipogon, Oryza nivara, may represent the most recent ancestor of O. sativa (13,15). Here we treat both O. rufipogon and O. nivara as part of the same ancestral gene pool and do not differentiate between these names when referring to wild rice.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, O. sativa japonica varieties were later developed in upland growing regions, selected from the indica rice (24,25). The alternative hypothesis of at least two separate domestication events leading to indica and japonica rice has been suggested by genetic distance studies (15,20,21,26,27). The genetic distance data reveal that japonica and indica are genetically distinct from each other, raising the possibility that the two major rice types may have arisen from different ancestral gene pools; however, these studies lack the resolution to identify unambiguously the geographic region(s) associated with the domestication of O. sativa.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Near East center of domestication (the ''Fertile Crescent''), the wild ancestors of the crops upon which agriculture was founded are known (e.g., wheats, barley, pea, lentil, and chickpea) (12). The geographic distributions of these wild ancestors, together with biochemical and genetic data, have been used to suggest that emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, peas, chickpeas, and lentils were domesticated from wild progenitors just once or a few times in a single geographic region (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) In contrast to the Near East center, crops domesticated in the Mediterranean region and other parts of the world have been derived more than once from their wild progenitors [e.g., olives (19)(20)(21), rice (22,23), and breadfruit (24)]. Within the Mesoamerican center of domestication (Central Mexico to northwestern Costa Rica), at least 80 native species have been cultivated historically (2, 3 25-29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O. sativa is believed to have been domesticated from the gene pool of the wild perennial species O. rufipogon Griff. and (or) the annual species O. nivara Sharma et Shastry (Yamanaka et al 2003). Various hypotheses have been proposed for the domestication of rice, including single, dual, and multiple domestication hypotheses (Oka 1988;Second 1982;Londo et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%