2017
DOI: 10.2298/csis160620008j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R-Tree for phase change memory

Abstract: Nowadays, many applications use spatial data for instance-location information, so storing spatial data is important. We suggest using R-Tree over PCM. Our objective is to design a PCM-sensitive R-Tree that can store spatial data as well as improve the endurance problem. Initially, we examine how R-Tree causes endurance problems in PCM, and we then optimize it for PCM. We propose doubling the leaf node size, writing a split node to a blank node, updating parent nodes only once and not merging the nodes after d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we experimentally validate the construction of the lazy splitting R-tree method and test the query efficiency. To test the performance of the algorithm, we tested our LAZY algorithm (the R-tree using the lazy splitting algorithm), the R-tree using R-tree PM algorithm [16] and the CBS splitting algorithm [14] on the same hardware and software platform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we experimentally validate the construction of the lazy splitting R-tree method and test the query efficiency. To test the performance of the algorithm, we tested our LAZY algorithm (the R-tree using the lazy splitting algorithm), the R-tree using R-tree PM algorithm [16] and the CBS splitting algorithm [14] on the same hardware and software platform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using a perfect hash function as a secondary index structure requires a lot of space, so this scheme is not suitable for large-scale spatial data processing. Jabarov et al [16] proposed an algorithm called R-tree PM algorithm, which doubles the leaf node size and designs a fill factor for the leaf nodes, which is split only when the node data volume reaches the minimum fill factor. Compared with the traditional R-Tree, the R-tree PM algorithm has an average improvement of 23% in processing time, but the R-tree splitting method is too simple and the split R-tree performance is not excellent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [27], a PCM-variant of the R-tree is proposed. R-tree is a well-known index that can handle spatial data.…”
Section: Indexing On Pcmmentioning
confidence: 99%