R&amp;D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks

Löfsten, Hans; Lindelöf, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.007

Cited by 187 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This incubation supports spin-offs development, not only in terms of strategic management and business orientation and of access to knowledge that is essential for completing the development of technologies or products, but also in what concerns access to physical facilities, particularly laboratories and administrative staff (Colombo and Delmastro, 2002;Lofsten and Lindelof, 2005;Mian, 1996;Wright et al, 2007). According to Salvador (2011), who analyzed the relationship between RBSOs and science parks/incubators, the main advantages perceived by the firms interviewed, concern the access to managerial competence; the availability of a variety of services, as well as a lower rent.…”

Section: Determinants In Rbso Creationmentioning

confidence: 89%

Entry by research-based spin-offs: the determinants of regional variation

Conceição¹,

Fontes²,

Pascoal‐Faria³

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Determinants In Rbso Creationmentioning

confidence: 89%

Entry by research-based spin-offs: the determinants of regional variation

Conceição¹,

Fontes²,

Pascoal‐Faria³

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2005). In addition, several definitions can be found in the literature, each placing the emphasis on the specific objective pursued: to promote the formation of new firms, improve the performance of the local economy, and favour the transfer of technology from universities to firms, among others (Westhead and Batstone, 1998).…”

Section: Time In the Parkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The development of networks inside parks which foster the mutual exchange and collective creation of knowledge has become particularly important for a firm's innovative capacity (Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2005). By incorporating sources of knowledge external to the park, firms can more easily convert their knowledge base into successful new products (Expósito-Langa et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From incubation to maturity inside parks: the evolution of local knowledge networks

Díez‐Vial

Montoro‐Sánchez

2017

IJTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses the effect of the evolution of local knowledge networks on the innovative capacity of firms co-located. Using a network dynamic approach, this paper argues that the length of time that firms spend in a science park affects their local knowledge network. By the identification of three stages of local development-incubation, growth and maturity-, this study provides new insights about the role of science parks in both increasing their innovative capacity and promoting the exchange of knowledge among co-located firms. In this sense, science parks have been increasingly considered as a nurturing environment for business start-ups and lead to the development of growth-oriented firms, not being a consensus about how the length of time the firm spends in the park may affect these benefits.

show abstract

“…Teknoparkta yer alan bir firma akademisyenlerle, bankalarla, avukatlarla, üniversitelerle veya farklı firmalarla resmi iş ilişkileri kurabildiği gibi, aile bağları, eğitim çalışmaları, sosyal aktiviteler gibi aynı fiziksel ortamın paylaşımına neden olan faaliyetler veya kafeterya gibi ortak mekanlar neticesinde gelişen arkadaşlık ilişkileri gibi gayri resmi ilişkiler kurabilmektedir (Löfsten ve Lindelöf, 2005;s.1028).…”

Section: Li̇teratür Taramasiunclassified

Patent Sisteminde Türkiye deki Teknoparkların Yeri

Pekol¹,

Erbaş²

2011

eab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technoparks, bridging science and technology infrastructure of universities with industry, are important formations in innovation systems. While there are several studies investigating the role of technoparks in the literature, particularly there is no study assessing technoparks in terms of patent system in Turkey. This study investigates the roles of Turkish technoparks in patent production from national innovation system perspective.The data obtained from both the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the survey conducted in technology development zones (TDZs), İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Ankara and TÜBİTAK-Marmara Research Center (TÜBİTAK-MAM) and Middle East Technical University (METU) are analyzed in this study. Results reveal the unique characteristics of tehcnoparks such as the strongest relationships with the university are fostered in METU and more knowledge spillovers through utilization of common areas and the highest number of patents exists in ITU. Consistent with the literature, the technoparks in Turkey seem to support innovation process, however extensive research are still due.

show abstract

R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks

Cited by 187 publications

References 43 publications

Entry by research-based spin-offs: the determinants of regional variation

Entry by research-based spin-offs: the determinants of regional variation

From incubation to maturity inside parks: the evolution of local knowledge networks

Patent Sisteminde Türkiye deki Teknoparkların Yeri

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About