2016
DOI: 10.1111/joes.12181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R&D INTENSITY AND THE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: A META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Abstract: We apply meta-regression techniques to provide a quantitative review of the empirical literature on how research and development (R&D) expenses affect the effective tax rate (ETR). R&D expenses relate to a well-accepted profit shifting channel, strategic placement of intellectual property within a multinational entity. Using a unique hand-collected data set, we add a new perspective to the current base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) state of research and debate, in three ways: First, observing that primary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The guidance related to mandatory disclosure rules (Action 12) is also being considered by a number of countries. In addition to countries that already have mandatory disclosure rules targeted at aggressive tax planning arrangements (e.g., Canada, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States), the EU Commission has recently submitted proposed legislation drawing on some of the best practices contained in the 2015 BEPS Action 12 Report, 58 and other countries have started internal reviews and public consultation processes (e.g., Australia, Japan, Poland and Sweden). See data available for all EU countries in the November 2016 assessment study 5 5.…”
Section: Recommendations Under Action 4 (Interest Deductibility)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidance related to mandatory disclosure rules (Action 12) is also being considered by a number of countries. In addition to countries that already have mandatory disclosure rules targeted at aggressive tax planning arrangements (e.g., Canada, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States), the EU Commission has recently submitted proposed legislation drawing on some of the best practices contained in the 2015 BEPS Action 12 Report, 58 and other countries have started internal reviews and public consultation processes (e.g., Australia, Japan, Poland and Sweden). See data available for all EU countries in the November 2016 assessment study 5 5.…”
Section: Recommendations Under Action 4 (Interest Deductibility)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect size contains several advantages . First, although the direct use of regression coefficients already has the positive characteristic of filtering out disruptive effects and to isolate the effect of interest (such as, for example, used by Belz, Hagen, & Steffens, 2016;Feld et al, 2013), it does not fulfill the requirement of comparability across studies. In contrast, the partial correlation coefficient enables us to make the effects comparable in scale and measure across the employed proxy variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for this, we included year dummies in the model. The method employed in this study closely follows that employed in Gupta and Newberry (1997), Harris and Feeny (2003), and Belz et al (2017): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%