R&D expenditure and managerial ownership: evidence from firms of high-vs-low R&D intensity

Abstract

Purpose Corporate managers spend on research and development (R&D) for reasons of growth and survival. However, they may be less willing to invest in R&D because of its long-term horizon, high failure rate and uncertain outcomes. This study aims to explore the extent to which managerial ownership influences R&D expenditure decisions. Design/methodology/approach Apart from the linear regression models, this study uses a semi-parametric quantile regression analysis for a sample of German non-financial firms throughout 2009–2018. Findings This study finds a nonmonotonic sensitivity of R&D spending to the level of managerial ownership over various quantiles of R&D distribution. That is, managerial ownership increases the expenditure on R&D at low R&D intensity firms. However, it decreases the expenditure on R&D at high R&D intensity firms. These results suggest the presence of a maximum level of R&D expenditure, after which owner-managers would be unwilling to spend on R&D. Practical implications The results confirm the importance of corporate ownership structure for firm R&D and innovation activities. It provides an implication for corporate policymakers to reform the corporate ownership structures to encourage corporate managers and owners to invest in R&D projects. Originality/value This study offers two distinct contributions study. First, it provides the first German shred of evidence on the nonlinear relationship between managerial ownership and R&D expenditure decisions by distinguishing between high and low R&D intensity firms. Second, unlike prior research, it uses a semi-parametric quantile regression analysis. This method is more efficient than least-squares estimators and produces robust estimators to heteroscedasticity of the residuals.

Future-oriented disclosure and corporate value: the role of an emerging economy corporate governance

“…Furthermore, this study focuses on management decisions to disclose future-oriented information in the annual reports. Examining other managerial decisions such as the Research and Development (R&D) spending (Hassanein et al, 2021a(Hassanein et al, , 2022 and other channels of disseminating information such as social media disclosure (Hassanein et al, 2021b) provide avenues for future research. Furthermore, investigating whether futureoriented disclosure in the annual report leads to an information overloading issue (e.g.…”

Ownership Structure And Risk Management Moderated By Audit Committee On Firm Performance

“…The results of this study support research (Al-Ahdal et al, 2023a), it was found that managerial ownership has a positive influence on firm performance, because company managers have an important role in the company's progress. This is supported by research (Salema, 2023) which explains that the greater share ownership by directors and commissioners will increase firm performance, so this has a positive effect, while research conducted by (Hassanein et al, 2023) shows that managerial ownership has an effect negative impact on firm performance because there are two roles played by managers so that decisions taken will focus on personal interests rather than company goals. Management that has a dual role, namely as owner and manager, tends to be more careful in making decisions.…”

Managerial ownership and financial distress: evidence from the Chinese stock market

“…Manso (2011) argues that managerial ownership provides managers greater job security and motivates them with higher tolerance for early failure of R&D activities. Hassanein et al. (2022) find that higher managerial ownership could increase firm R&D investment in firms with low R&D intensity.…”

“…Manso (2011) argues that managerial ownership provides managers greater job security and motivates them with higher tolerance for early failure of R&D activities. Hassanein et al (2022) find that higher managerial ownership could increase firm R&D investment in firms with low R&D intensity. Thus, entrenched managers are more likely to apply more R&D investment to alleviate adverse financial status issues caused by high agency costs.…”