R&D and Foreign Subsidiary Performance at or Below the Technology Frontier

Abstract

We examine the effect of R&D on foreign subsidiaries' productivity performance. We argue that both local R&D expenditures in the subsidiary and R&D conducted in the wider network of the multinational enterprise (MNE) for the subsidiary improve productivity but that their respective roles depend on whether the host country of the subsidiary is at or below the global technology frontier. Local R&D is more effective if the host country is at the frontier, while R&D conducted in the MNE network is more effective if the host country is behind the frontier. In the latter case, both types of R&D are complementary and reinforce each other's effect on productivity performance. We test hypotheses on fine-grained longitudinal micro data on affiliate productivity and R&D investments. We estimate dynamic productivity models controlling for endogeneity and allowing for declining returns to R&D and productivity convergence.

Patent protection and foreign R&D investment location choices: inventor mobility and policy convergence

“…Third, we conceptualized R&D investment location decisions as individual decisions by multinational firms, which take into account whether there is a prior R&D unit in the country. Yet, multinational firms may take their entire global portfolio of R&D units into account when deciding on new R&D investment locations in a complex trade-off between scale, redundancy, and diversity (Kim, 2015;Kafouros et al, 2018;Belderbos, De Michiel, Lokshin, 2022). Future research could further develop such a portfolio approach to global R&D, in which preferably also a distinction is made between research on the one hand and development activities on the other hand (e.g., Kuemmerle, 1999;Belderbos et al, 2009).…”

Future directions of R&D internationalization in international business

“…MNEs can develop knowledge-based resources internally by conducting their own R&D or sourcing knowledge externally (Elia et al, 2020). However, conducting R&D in host countries on the global technology frontier may have distinct advantages over R&D performed by an MNE at home or elsewhere within the MNE's network (Belderbos et al, 2021). The eclectic paradigm, which is also referred to as the OLI framework, specifies three conditions that must be satisfied for firms to engage in crossborder activities (Dunning, 1977(Dunning, , 1988: ownership advantage, location advantage and internalization advantage.…”

Study on the impact of R&D input intensity on technological innovation output ‐ Based on data from China’s high technology industry

“…In terms of the relationship between foreign institutional inputs and innovation output of Chinese energy firms, there is a significant positive correlation between the two [ 38 ]. That is, the rise in a country’s FDI stock has a significant contribution to export technological sophistication [ 39 ].…”