2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quoted spreads and trade imbalance dynamics in the European Treasury bond market

Abstract: Using high-frequency transaction data for the three largest European markets (France, Germany and Italy), this paper documents the existence of an asymmetric relationship between market liquidity and trading imbalances: when quoted spreads rise (fall) and liquidity falls (increases) buy (sell) orders tend to prevail. Risk-averse market-makers, with inventory-depletion risk being their main concern, tend to quote wider (narrower) spreads when they think bond appreciation is more (less) likely to occur. It is al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings provide insight on market liquidity and provide an interesting compliment to previous work that has largely focused on the relation between price formation, market liquidity, and trading book imbalances (Menkveld et al, 2004;Caporale et al, 2012), the price discovery process on MTS (Dunne et al, 2007;Caporale and Girardi, 2013), the relation between cost of funds and liquidity (Biais et al, 2004), the overcrowding of liquidity (Coppola et al, 2013), and the impact of informational content of trading activity on bond prices (Alfonso Dufour, 2012). It also lends a different perspective to other studies that operate more from a macro perspective, focusing, for example, on the relation between credit risk and liquidity (Beber et al, 2009;Pelizzon et al, 2016), or volatility and liquidity (Favero et al, 2010) for determining bond yields.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our findings provide insight on market liquidity and provide an interesting compliment to previous work that has largely focused on the relation between price formation, market liquidity, and trading book imbalances (Menkveld et al, 2004;Caporale et al, 2012), the price discovery process on MTS (Dunne et al, 2007;Caporale and Girardi, 2013), the relation between cost of funds and liquidity (Biais et al, 2004), the overcrowding of liquidity (Coppola et al, 2013), and the impact of informational content of trading activity on bond prices (Alfonso Dufour, 2012). It also lends a different perspective to other studies that operate more from a macro perspective, focusing, for example, on the relation between credit risk and liquidity (Beber et al, 2009;Pelizzon et al, 2016), or volatility and liquidity (Favero et al, 2010) for determining bond yields.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our findings provide insight on market liquidity and provide an interesting compliment to previous work that has largely focused on the relation between price formation, market liquidity, and trading book imbalances (Menkveld et al, 2004;Caporale et al, 2012), the price discovery process on MTS (Dunne et al, 2007;Caporale and Girardi, 2013), the relation between cost of funds and liquidity (Biais et al, 2004), the overcrowding of liquidity (Coppola et al, 2013), and the impact of informational content of trading activity on bond prices (Alfonso Dufour, 2012). It also lends a different perspective to other studies that operate more from a macro perspective, focusing, for example, on the relation between credit risk and liquidity (Beber et al, 2009;Pelizzon et al, 2016), or volatility and liquidity (Favero et al, 2010) for determining bond yields.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is naturally related to the expanding literature investigating how the secondary market for eurodenominated securities functions. Previous studies have focused on the dynamic relationship between trading activity and price movements (Cheung et al, 2005) or between yield dynamics and order flow (Menkveld et al, 2004), on the determination of the benchmark [3] status among securities of similar maturity (Dunne et al, 2007), on the analysis of yield differentials between sovereign bonds (Beber et al, 2009), and on whether endogenously determined liquidity and trading activity conditions are driven by common factors for the European market as a whole (Caporale et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%