2018
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quorum quenching activity of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria and its potential application in mitigation of membrane biofouling

Abstract: BACKGROUND Quorum sensing (QS) could regulate gene expression so as to mediate some bacterial behaviors such as the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and biofilm formation. In this study, a quorum quenching (QQ) bacterium was isolated from an indigenous lab‐scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and encapsulated in a dumpling‐shaped microbial bag for biofouling control. RESULTS This QQ bacteria has a higher genetic homology with Acinetobacter bereziniae strain. The effect of time and temperature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with traditional activated sludge process, MBR has the advantages of small area, long sludge retention time, low sludge yield, good effluent quality, flexible process design, high nutrient removal rate, high removal rate of organic pollutants, and persistent organic pollutants Hu, Wang, Ngo, Sun, & Yang, 2018). However, membrane fouling is still the main limitation of MBR process development (Gu, Huang, Zeng, Shi, Hu, et al, 2018;Qu et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2018;Teng et al, 2018). In view of this, how to improve the treatment efficiency of MBR while improving the anti-fouling ability of membrane is the research focus of relevant personnel (Park, Yamashita, & Tanaka, 2018).…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactors (Mbrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional activated sludge process, MBR has the advantages of small area, long sludge retention time, low sludge yield, good effluent quality, flexible process design, high nutrient removal rate, high removal rate of organic pollutants, and persistent organic pollutants Hu, Wang, Ngo, Sun, & Yang, 2018). However, membrane fouling is still the main limitation of MBR process development (Gu, Huang, Zeng, Shi, Hu, et al, 2018;Qu et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2018;Teng et al, 2018). In view of this, how to improve the treatment efficiency of MBR while improving the anti-fouling ability of membrane is the research focus of relevant personnel (Park, Yamashita, & Tanaka, 2018).…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactors (Mbrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QQ-based approaches have been used to control biofilm formation on membranes (i.e., biofouling), because QS has been shown to play an essential role in membrane biofouling. Disruption of cell communication by using enzymes to degrade QS signals has been reported to be an effective method to mitigate membrane biofouling in water purification (Gu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Qs-targeted Biofilm Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signaling molecule DSF has been identified as cis -11-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid and was associated with the pathogenic process caused by Xcc ( He and Zhang, 2008 ; Deng et al., 2015 ; Zhou et al., 2015 ). Suppressing the expression of pathogenic genes during QS through blocking intercellular communication between pathogenic bacteria interferes with QS and has been recognized as a highly promising disease control measure, also known as quorum quenching (QQ) ( Gu et al., 2018 ; Xu et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2022 ). QQ is a new strategy for disease control, proposed based on QS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%