2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30985-5_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QuOD: An NLP Tool to Improve the Quality of Business Process Descriptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation, it is not clear whether and how KS empirically contributes to the effective exploration of SPI knowledge, since individuals may not be willing to speak out and share solution knowledge that may reveal self-failures, expose self-weaknesses and disclose problematic work areas (Ghobadi and Mathiassen, 2016). Moreover, once implemented solutions are made available for replication in projects, they may soon become legacy processes (Ferrari et al, 2019) in projects due to the unique and dynamic nature of project development. In this situation, the effect of sharing existing solution knowledge and how the knowledge is effectively exploited in projects is empirically unknown.…”
Section: Integratedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, it is not clear whether and how KS empirically contributes to the effective exploration of SPI knowledge, since individuals may not be willing to speak out and share solution knowledge that may reveal self-failures, expose self-weaknesses and disclose problematic work areas (Ghobadi and Mathiassen, 2016). Moreover, once implemented solutions are made available for replication in projects, they may soon become legacy processes (Ferrari et al, 2019) in projects due to the unique and dynamic nature of project development. In this situation, the effect of sharing existing solution knowledge and how the knowledge is effectively exploited in projects is empirically unknown.…”
Section: Integratedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O algoritmo alcançou uma média de 83,8% na identificação de conflitos. Uma das razões desse resultado é a análise do requisito em composições semânticas mais refinadas, pois o algoritmo lida com os requisitos no formato de tuplas.Outra estratégia para detectar ambiguidade e inconsistência nos requisitos é a criação de heurísticas Ferrari, Spagnolo et al (2019). criaram uma ferramenta Web com a implantação de um conjunto de regras linguísticas.…”
unclassified