2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notes 1. Although the distinction between these phases and forms of neoliberalism is made in the context of the north Atlantic zone, they are evident in other parts of the world as neoliberal global capitalist governance gained hegemony over the third world (Sangameswaran, 2009;Sheppard & Leitner, 2010). 2.…”
Section: Unauthorised Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes 1. Although the distinction between these phases and forms of neoliberalism is made in the context of the north Atlantic zone, they are evident in other parts of the world as neoliberal global capitalist governance gained hegemony over the third world (Sangameswaran, 2009;Sheppard & Leitner, 2010). 2.…”
Section: Unauthorised Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While interurban knowledge sharing has a long history (Harris and Moore, 2013), policy mobilities scholarship notes an increasingly prominent fusion o f knowledge sharing and policy networking as assemblages o f designs, experts, expertise, materials, and tech nologies evolve in transit as part o f the policy sharing process (McCann and Ward, 2011). Contemporary urban policy making is said to reflect broader variegations in neoliberal political economies (Sheppard and Leitner, 2010), as mobile policies mutate as they are emulated and tailored through local experimentation (McCann, 2010). As with more localized forms of entrepreneurial urban management, this networking is both aggressively marketed to municipal governments by consultants and local elites (Peck and Theodore, 2010;Prince, 2012), and leveraged by those governments for place promotion via extrospective 'policy boosterism' (McCann, 2013).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Cities: From Place Competition To Competitivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this context, their privately funded activities were frequently development-focused (McFarlane, 2006;Glassman, 2010;Sheppard and Leitner, 2010), seeking to solve problems 'over there' (Bell, 2000; see also, Oldfield et al, 2004;Lunn, 2009;Palmer, 2010). Although it is important to be mindful of the size of these donations in relation to both the total assets of the university and the scale of the 'problems' they purported to 'solve', their genealogy can be traced back to the work of the large Northern philanthropic foundations, such as the Carnegie Corporation and the Rockefeller Foundation (Bell, 2000(Bell, , 2002Lambert and Lester, 2004).…”
Section: (Ii) Responding To Global Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%