2000
DOI: 10.1007/s11612-000-0028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quo vadis, Hausgemeinschaft? Zum Wandel nachbarschaftlicher Beziehungen in den östlichen Bundesländern

Abstract: Quo vadis, Hausgemeinschaft? Zum Wandel nachbarschaftlicher Beziehungen in den östlichen BundesländernDen Nachbarschaftskontakten der ostdeutschen Bevölkerung vor der Wiedervereinigung wird heute oft mit romantischer Verklärtheit ein hohes Maß an Stabilität, Solidarität, menschlicher Nähe und Gemeinschaftssinn nachgesagt. Rückblickend werden die Gestalt nachbarschaftlicher Beziehungen im Kollektiv der sozialistischen Hausgemeinschaft und die individuelle Bedeutung dieser informellen Sozialkontakte als sozialis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…People were expected to form building communities (Hausgemeinschaften) that took responsibility for common areas and took turns mopping the stairs, for example, or taking care of the yard in front of the building. These state-mandated building communities often celebrated special occasions and held festivities together, but they could also feel like social pressure, as people would take notice of even the smallest changes in a family (Günther and Nestmann 2000).…”
Section: Unsupervised Times As Lonelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People were expected to form building communities (Hausgemeinschaften) that took responsibility for common areas and took turns mopping the stairs, for example, or taking care of the yard in front of the building. These state-mandated building communities often celebrated special occasions and held festivities together, but they could also feel like social pressure, as people would take notice of even the smallest changes in a family (Günther and Nestmann 2000).…”
Section: Unsupervised Times As Lonelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People were expected to form building communities (Hausgemeinschaften) that took responsibility for common areas and took turns mopping the stairs, for example, or taking care of the yard in front of the building. These state-mandated building communities often celebrated special occasions and held festivities together, but they could also feel like social pressure, as people would take notice of even the smallest changes in a family (Günther and Nestmann 2000).…”
Section: Unsupervised Times As Lonelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Des weiteren wird hier betont, dass allein das sichere Wissen als unterstützend erlebt wird, in Notsituationen nachbarschaftliche Hilfe erbitten zu können und diese auch gewährt zu bekommen (vgl. auch Günther & Nestmann, 2000). Allerdings ist hier zu beachten, dass es sich bei den erhobenen Nachbarschaftsbeziehungen um langjährig bestehende Kontakte handelt, was ein Zeichen dafür ist, dass der Transfer emotionaler Unterstützung zwischen Nachbarn kontinuierlich gewachsene Bindungen und ein gewisses Maß an freundschaftlicher Vertrautheit voraussetzt.…”
Section: Inhalte Informeller Nachbarschaftlicher Unterstützungunclassified