2001
DOI: 10.1002/oa.552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quit blubbering: an examination of Nuu'chah'nulth (Nootkan) whale butchery

Abstract: Archaeological research on North America's northwest coast has produced evidence of aboriginal whale use spanning the past 4000 years. The Toquaht Archaeological Project, on the west coast of Canada's Vancouver Island, recovered numerous whale skeletal elements, many of which show butchering marks. This paper examines these elements from the points of view of element frequency, and of type and location of butchering marks. The examination of these marks reveals the portions into which the whales were cut, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, at Qajaa, two narwhal bones were found along with a single bone from an unidentified cetacean out of ∼15,000 bones (0.02%)8. The underrepresentation of whale bones in archaeological sites is a well-known phenomenon, typically ascribed to difficulties in transporting large carcasses from shore to the settlement3435 in combination with the higher value of blubber or meat compared with bones36. In the arctic, several studies have suggested that the fossil record may underestimate the importance of whales to ancient Arctic cultures459, however, the lack of suitable methods to detect remains of tissue like blubber and meat in sediment have prevented further investigations on this matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, at Qajaa, two narwhal bones were found along with a single bone from an unidentified cetacean out of ∼15,000 bones (0.02%)8. The underrepresentation of whale bones in archaeological sites is a well-known phenomenon, typically ascribed to difficulties in transporting large carcasses from shore to the settlement3435 in combination with the higher value of blubber or meat compared with bones36. In the arctic, several studies have suggested that the fossil record may underestimate the importance of whales to ancient Arctic cultures459, however, the lack of suitable methods to detect remains of tissue like blubber and meat in sediment have prevented further investigations on this matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was hunted in the Eastern Arctic, and together with the humpback whale, was taken in Greenland by early Greenlandic whalers [ 21 ]. Archaeological sites along the Pacific Northwest Coast (where whale use has been demonstrated for at least 4,000 years [ 48 , 49 ]) have yielded only a small proportion of right whale bones, while gray whale and humpback whale remains constitute almost the entirety of the bone assemblages of archaeological sites such as the Toquaht sites on Vancouver Island [ 48 ], the Ozette site in Washington State [ 50 ] and the Par-Tee site on the Oregon Coast [ 51 ]. The gray whale, whose range extends to the Chukchi Sea and Wrangel Island, was also hunted by Chukchi and Inuit in Russia [ 21 ] and in Japan [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, removal of meat from bowhead bones would not require the degree of heavy fragmentation encountered at Feature 2 (e.g., Monks, 2001). In addition, the very low incidence (< 0.5%) of charred and burnt whale bone, as well as the lack of any discernable hearth or cooking area in the excavations, suggests that grease production was not carried out within the house.…”
Section: Reduction and Tool Manufacture At Mckinley Baymentioning
confidence: 99%