2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cloud.2010.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QUIRC: A Quantitative Impact and Risk Assessment Framework for Cloud Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
107
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk assessment in distributed computing has been extensively studied in the literature, either as a general methodology [2], [3], [4] or focusing on a specific type of risk, such as security and SLA fulfilment [5], [6]. These projects have included objectives ranging from information protection, evaluation /prediction of QoS and probability of SLA failures [2], [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Risk assessment in distributed computing has been extensively studied in the literature, either as a general methodology [2], [3], [4] or focusing on a specific type of risk, such as security and SLA fulfilment [5], [6]. These projects have included objectives ranging from information protection, evaluation /prediction of QoS and probability of SLA failures [2], [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessment has been introduced into utility computing such as Grids and clouds either as a general methodology [2], [3], [4] or focusing on a specific type of risk, such as security and SLA fulfilment [5], [6]. However, the aim of this paper is to propose a risk assessment framework for cloud service provision, in terms of assessing and improving the reliability and productivity of fulfilling an SLA in a cloud environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now, the risk evaluating for the cloud is directly derived from the traditional one, such as [9], [10]. They all make the cloud platforms as the evaluating objects but the users' assets.…”
Section: Risk Evaluatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] under data governance the writer highlighted that multitenancy arrangements are raising questions about data segregation. NIST developed a report titled "Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing"; they identified multitenancy as a downside in the cloud [18].…”
Section: Issn: 2320-5407mentioning
confidence: 99%