2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quinolines derivatives as novel sunscreening agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17] All four species presented considerable protection, both for UVB and UVA radiations, being L. brasiliensis the one that presented the higher protection for both parameters ( Table 1 and Figure 1). Yet, it is advisable that the UVAPF should be at least 1/3 of the SPF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] All four species presented considerable protection, both for UVB and UVA radiations, being L. brasiliensis the one that presented the higher protection for both parameters ( Table 1 and Figure 1). Yet, it is advisable that the UVAPF should be at least 1/3 of the SPF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other potential synthetic UV filters with different scaffolds have been described, namely those with heterocyclic rings, such as the new UV absorbers 167 – 178 based on quinoline derivatives with SPF and λ c values between 2 and 11 and 376 and 388 nm, respectively, being the quinoline derivative 176 considered as the most promising compound with the highest SPF value [ 143 ]. ( E , Z )-2-ethylhexyl-2-cyano-3-(furan-2-yl)acrylate ( 179 ) has also been described for its good capacity to absorb UVA radiation (λ max = 339 nm) and good solubility in oils for the formulation [ 144 ].…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic tools have shown that currently one in three cancer cases is skin cancer of some type . UVA and UVB radiation has been proven to produce DNA damage directly and/or indirectly through DNA adducts or the generation of ROS, which promote tumor formation through various pathways .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Diagnostic tools have shown that currently one in three cancer cases is skin cancer of some type. [15] UVAand UVB radiation has been proven to produce DNA damage directlya nd/or indirectly throughD NA adducts or the generation of ROS, which promote tumor formation through various pathways. [16] However,t he phototoxic effect of UVAr adiation is much lower than that of UVB, because UVAi se fficient at generating ROS that can damage DNA by indirect photosensitizing reactions, and such DNA, which causes molecular rearrangements forming the specific photoproducts, directly absorbsU VB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%