Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2882903.2882940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quickr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For queries that are not boundedly evaluable, an approach is to compute approximate answers under available re- sources. Approximation techniques have been extensively studied, based on synopsis (e.g., [35][36][37][38][39]) or dynamic sampling (e.g., [40][41][42]). We have proposed a data-driven approximation scheme [17] that computes approximate answers to an RA aggr query Q in a dataset , by identifying a fraction of under an extension of the access schema of [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For queries that are not boundedly evaluable, an approach is to compute approximate answers under available re- sources. Approximation techniques have been extensively studied, based on synopsis (e.g., [35][36][37][38][39]) or dynamic sampling (e.g., [40][41][42]). We have proposed a data-driven approximation scheme [17] that computes approximate answers to an RA aggr query Q in a dataset , by identifying a fraction of under an extension of the access schema of [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the selected blocks are considered as random samples of D. However, statistics built from blocklevel samples may not be as good as those from record-level sampling. Several solutions were proposed to reduce data bias in block-level samples in databases [19] and big data clusters [43]- [45]. The problem occurs due to the inconsistent probability distributions in the distributed data blocks of a data set.…”
Section: B Random Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may take a long time particularly for candidate networks with some base relations. There are several join sampling methods that compute a sample of a join by joining only samples the input tables and avoid computing the full join [14,37,50]. To sample the results of join R 1 ▷◁ R 2 , most of these methods must know some statistics, such as the number of tuples in R 2 that join with each tuple in R 1 , before performing the join.…”
Section: Poissonmentioning
confidence: 99%