Quick Vegas: Improving Performance of TCP Vegas for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks

Chan, Yi Cheng; Lin, Chia Liang; Ho, Cheng Yuan

doi:10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.4.987

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is unfair bandwidth allocation by TCP Vegas in wired and wired-cum-wireless heterogeneous networks and always exhibits lower delay. [5] : This paper improved the TCP Vegas algorithm and renamed it as "QUICK VEGAS". It uses an estimated amount of data that is extra to update to congestion window at a connection source.…”

Section: "Performance Evaluation Of Tcp Vegas Versus Different Tcpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transport Layer Congestion Control Technique (TCP VEGAS)

Sah¹

2018

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As TCP is more popular and dominant congestion control technique. TCP congestion control techniques assure reliable data transmission and detecting congestion based on packet loss or packet delay. When the network is heavily loaded there is a loss of network performance called congestion. There are two types of network that is Homogenous and Heterogeneous network and various TCP variants which can be evaluated using network simulators. There is not a fair bandwidth allocation in a homogeneous network, but fair in heterogeneous network and has a significantly lower delay. This paper will present various TCP Variants related to TCP Vegas.

show abstract

Section: "Performance Evaluation Of Tcp Vegas Versus Different Tcpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transport Layer Congestion Control Technique (TCP VEGAS)

Sah¹

2018

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…TCP Vegas updates its congestion window linearly in the congestion avoidance phase, it is too sluggish for a high BDP network [8]. If Δ < α, the connection may be under utilizing the available bandwidth.…”

Section: B Congestion Avoidance Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

A Delay Based TCP for Data Center Networks

Chang¹,

Chan²

2016

Fourth International Conference on Advances in Information Processing and Communication Technology - IPCT 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Solving (13) for t, we obtain Using the second modification of CODE, CWND can increase by two every three RTTs, while in NewVegas, it can increase by one every other RTT; the slope of CODE between j and k is around two-thirds of that of Reno, and therefore, we assume that CODE will increase its CWND by two every three RTTs between j and k. Substituting (14) into (10), the total packets sent by CODE in a cycle is…”

Section: Numerical Analysis Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vegas also outperforms TCP Newreno [14]. However, studies have shown that when Reno and Vegas connections coexist in the same network, Reno obtains a greater amount of bandwidth as compared to Vegas [12,15,16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%