2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-017-0317-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quick but Odd Growth of Cacti

Abstract: Let F be a family of graphs. Given an input graph G and a positive integer k, testing whether G has a k-sized subset of vertices S, such that G \ S belongs to F, is a prototype vertex deletion problem. These type of problems have attracted a lot of attention in recent times in the domain of parameterized complexity. In this paper, we study two such problems; when F is either a family of cactus graphs or a family of odd-cactus graphs. A graph H is called a cactus graph if every pair of cycles in H intersect on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aim to extend known complexity results for Feedback Vertex Set for H-free graphs and to perform a new, similar study for Even Cycle Transversal (for which, so far, mainly parameterized complexity results exist [2,3,11,12]). To describe the known and new results we need some terminology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to extend known complexity results for Feedback Vertex Set for H-free graphs and to perform a new, similar study for Even Cycle Transversal (for which, so far, mainly parameterized complexity results exist [2,3,11,12]). To describe the known and new results we need some terminology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Pseudo Forest Vertex Deletion can be solved deterministically in time O * (3 k ) [2] and randomizedly in time O * (2.85 k ) [12] and Bounded Degree-2 Vertex Deletion can be solved deterministically in time O * (3.0645 k ) [19] and randomizedly in time O * (3 k ) [8]. Among others, the known gap on Cactus Vertex Deletion is remarkable: Bonnet et al [3] presented a deterministic O * (26 k )-time algorithm, while Koley et al [15] presented a randomized O * (12 k )-time algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a graph has no cycles of even length if and only if it is a forest of odd cacti [15]. Kolet et al [15] gave an O * (12 k )-time randomized algorithm and Misra et al [17] gave an O * (50 k )-time deterministic algorithm for Even Cycle Transversal. In this paper, we improve the running time of the deterministic algorithm for Even Cycle Transversal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a forest is a graph in the class Φ {K2} , a cactus graph is a graph in the class Φ C where C consists of K 2 and all cycles, and a complete-block imply that there is a c k n O(1) -time algorithm for Diamond Hitting Set [9,12,14], but an exact value for c is not forthcoming from these approaches. However, Kolay et al [15] obtained a 12 k n O(1) -time randomized algorithm. For the variant where each cycle must additionally be odd (that is, P consists of K 2 and all odd cycles), there is a 50 k n O (1) -time deterministic algorithm due to Misra et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%