1999
DOI: 10.1207/s15327841mpee0304_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Quick and Easy" Formulae for Approximating Statistical Power in Repeated Measures ANOVA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His data were judged to be outlying (4.36 SD > mean) and were not included in the analysis. A sample of 27 provided statistical power to detect a true effect of ≥ 0.27 SD between the ginger and placebo conditions given the cross-over design of the study, an alpha error of 0.05, and a correlation between repeated trials of ≥ 0.90 on the outcome measures (Park and Schutz, 1999). The methods were reviewed and approved by the University of Georgia Institutional Review Board, and all participants read and signed an informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His data were judged to be outlying (4.36 SD > mean) and were not included in the analysis. A sample of 27 provided statistical power to detect a true effect of ≥ 0.27 SD between the ginger and placebo conditions given the cross-over design of the study, an alpha error of 0.05, and a correlation between repeated trials of ≥ 0.90 on the outcome measures (Park and Schutz, 1999). The methods were reviewed and approved by the University of Georgia Institutional Review Board, and all participants read and signed an informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power analysis for VO 2max revealed that 9-12 subjects were necessary to detect a moderate effect of d = 0.5, assuming a correlation between the repeated measures of 0.9, α = 0.05, and power ≈ 0.8 (Potvin and Schultz, 2000;Park and Schutz, 1999). Male and female college-aged students (19 -29 years old) were recruited to participate in the study.…”
Section: Subject Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were cyclists and triathletes averaging 184 ± 82 km/week cycling and/or 16 ± 14 km/week running. Power analysis (Park and Schutz 1999) performed in advance revealed the sample size of N = 10 was sufficient to detect a moderate effect size (Potvin and Schutz 2000) among the measures of _ VO 2max (control, 15-, 45-min without cooling, and 45-min with fan). The study was approved by the university's institutional review board in advance, and subjects gave written informed consent prior to testing.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%