PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/e577562012-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queuing network modeling of age differences in driver mental workload and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QN family of models were used to model driving performance including lateral movement and steering (Cao & Liu, 2014; Feng, 2015) and NDRT performance (Fuller et al, 2012; Wu & Liu, 2006) (Table 2). Most studies validated model’s performance with human-subject data (Bi et al, 2013a, 2013b; Zhao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QN family of models were used to model driving performance including lateral movement and steering (Cao & Liu, 2014; Feng, 2015) and NDRT performance (Fuller et al, 2012; Wu & Liu, 2006) (Table 2). Most studies validated model’s performance with human-subject data (Bi et al, 2013a, 2013b; Zhao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some unique characteristics of QN-MHP observed from the studies. First, the model was used to quantify cognitive workload (i.e., NASA-TLX dimensions) and situation awareness (based on Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT)) (Bi et al, 2015; Feng et al, 2017; Feng et al, 2014; Jeong & Liu, 2017b, 2018; Rehman et al, 2019; Wu & Liu, 2006; Wu et al, 2012). Second, QN-MHP was used in many studies to measure visual attention allocation (Feng, 2015; Fuller, 2010; Jeong, 2018; Lim et al, 2010; Sanghavi, 2020; Tsimhoni, 2004), which indicates the capability of QN-MHP to model human perception as compared to GOMS and ACT-R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into the simulation and empirical validations of the system. Previous published work of QN-MHP has considered an aging factor (variable A in Equations 2-7 in Wu & Liu, 2006b, 2006c) as one of the major factors in predicting driver workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides modeling human performance in these tasks, QN-MHP is also used to account for the indexes of mental workload: subjective workload rating measured by NASA-TLX (Wu & Liu, 2006b, 2006c and the amplitude and latency of P300 component measured by the event related brain potential (ERP) techniques (Wu & Liu, 2006a).…”
Section: Queuing Network Modeling Of Human Performance and Mental Wormentioning
confidence: 99%