2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-019-00997-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questions of Concern in Drawing Up a Remote Sensing Change Detection Plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, MCENet achieved optimal quantitative results on the SECOND dataset, with the overall performance evaluation reaching 88.42% OA, 52.21% F1, 22.06% Sek, and 37.41% Score. In the partial visualization results of Figure 9, all the benchmark networks exhibit incompleteness and fragmentation issues in change region detection, and they also have confusion in identifying low vegetation and trees (e.g., (1) in Figure 9). FCCDN, PCFN, and SCDNet encounter segmentation ambiguity when detecting high-density and non-obvious buildings, and the ability to detect partial classes is unsatisfactory, especially playgrounds (e.g., ( 2) and ( 4) in Figure 9).…”
Section: Results On the Second Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, MCENet achieved optimal quantitative results on the SECOND dataset, with the overall performance evaluation reaching 88.42% OA, 52.21% F1, 22.06% Sek, and 37.41% Score. In the partial visualization results of Figure 9, all the benchmark networks exhibit incompleteness and fragmentation issues in change region detection, and they also have confusion in identifying low vegetation and trees (e.g., (1) in Figure 9). FCCDN, PCFN, and SCDNet encounter segmentation ambiguity when detecting high-density and non-obvious buildings, and the ability to detect partial classes is unsatisfactory, especially playgrounds (e.g., ( 2) and ( 4) in Figure 9).…”
Section: Results On the Second Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While BIT overcomes the shortcoming in feature extraction, the lack of connection among branches leads to semantic false classification and miss detection in complex regions (e.g., ( 2) and (3) in Figure 9). The results of BiSRNet reveal that its ability to differentiate between different surfaces with similar spectral features is not highly satisfactory, including semantic confusion between non-vegetated surfaces and buildings (e.g., (1) in Figure 9). Furthermore, BiSRNet has also exhibited similar issues of target omission as the baseline network (e.g., (2) and (3) in Figure 9).…”
Section: Results On the Second Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations